User talk:RickDikeman

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 21:21, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Cincinnati

Your photo is outstanding. One of the best cityscapes at Wikipedia. Can you id in the caption the tallest tower? Were you standing in [[Covington, Kentucky[[? That would be more precise.--Wetman 22:47, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Very nice photo of the Gateway Arch. -- Decumanus 23:31, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)

American Museum of Natural History Ouch. I certainly didn't do anything to remove the photo. I added a reference to it in the text that's all. You must have fixed it, though, because it looks okay to me now. Sorry to give anxious moments, especially over my favorite local landmark! Wetman 06:55, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Sorry - I was asleep. I've changed the tag - I didn't notice that you were the author. For a list of tags look at Wikipedia:Image Tag Team. Sorry again. Secretlondon 13:04, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)

Rdikeman -- I'm loving the pictures you're adding of the sportsmen. Great shot of Super Mario, particularly... GWO

I'm adding a draft of the Speedway table to Indianapolis Motor Speedway; since that page seems mostly your baby, and since that page is the most developed speedway page, I wanted your input on how well it works. What changes should be made, or should it be nixed altogether? --Golbez 17:46, 23 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. :) Now a logistical question... please look at Atlanta Motor Speedway. Now, I'm starting to think, maybe we shouldn't list the races in the table. Races can come and go on a regular basis, and not only that, not all are major enough to be listed, and that's a difficult line to draw. Also, perhaps only static stats should be in the table, like physical dimensions. Or, maybe just the most important races (Nextel Cup, IRL and Formula One come to mind). What do you think? Also, any suggestions for more info to put in the table? Ownership (major when dealing with NASCAR, since about a dozen speedways are owned by two companies), seating capacity, etc? --Golbez 04:26, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd still list all the races in the body, so no information would be lost. I just wanted to keep the table for the most pertinent info. OK, I'll list the major races (again, Nextel, IRL and F1, maybe Busch and Craftsman) and put a full list of races in the body as necessary. Indy is easy - there's only three races there, I think. But Lowe's and California and Daytona become more difficult. I'll figure it out. :) --Golbez 18:20, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just started to wonder more about Image:Olympic_flame.jpg. Do you know where it was taken, the date, and perhaps the name of the torchbearer? Those would be helpful on the image description page. Thanks! -- ke4roh 03:12, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Baseball.jpg

You have given no source or copyright info for Image:Baseball.jpg. You really must. Ed g2s 15:41, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Yes, please do. I just came here to let you know that. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 15:01, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Baseball.gif suffered from severe dithering, so I cleaned it up and saved it as Image:Baseball.jpg. Anything to be learned about the source of the original image must come from Soze, who uploaded it. Rdikeman 21:58, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)

Photos

Hi Rick,

After seeing your Ralf Schumacher shot on Formula One) I've just been looking over some of your photos - good job! -- Solipsist 07:58, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thought you might like to know I've now nominated this image on WP:FPC. Good luck. -- Solipsist 19:28, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

And I might as well nominate Image:Baseball pitching motion 2004.jpg whilst I'm at it. I'm not much of a sports fan, but I'm still impressed to see your portfolio. -- Solipsist 19:45, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

photos from around the world?

Hello there. :) Press Corps has been slow recently, but we *did* get some decent footage of the political conventions this past month. Do you have any print-quality images from around the world? We are planning a newsletter and trying to include a nice diversity of photographs. +sj + 00:06, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Barnstar!

Hey there Rick, I would like to give you this barnstar. I think you do an excellent job on Wikipedia, obviously not merely with your sports photography, but as Sports seems to be "your thing" I award you for that specifically. Cheers, [[User:Solitude|Solitude\^talk]] 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following images:

We noticed they currently don't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 03:26, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Use of your photos under another license?

Hi. Please excuse my possibly deficient English, this is not my mother tongue. I am part of a forum community that has launched some weeks ago a french-speaking (multilingual if volunteers ask) wiki-based encyclopedia dealing with Motor-racing and Formula One, named WikiF1. The content is under Creative Commons by-nc-sa (Personally, I was pushing for the choice of the GFDL --in order to have our content integrated more easily in the french Wikipedia, that is deficient about motor-racing, to be a real help for it-- but the community vote has chosen this license --less free than the GFDL or the CC by-sa, with this "nc" clause-- that will complicate the exchange.

Would you accept your photos to be redistributed under the Creative Commons by-nc-sa? If it is not your will, we probably use them under the GNU FDL licence, tagging it clearly with it, but licensing will be confusing for the readers I think.

Thank you very much by advance, for your consideration. --Mayfoev 14:36, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Pic of the Day

Hi Rick,

Just to let you know that your photo Image:Baseball pitching motion 2004.jpg is up for reuse as Pic of the Day today. I've reused the same caption as last time, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/March 17, 2005. Sorry for the late notice, but I've been struggling against the database being frequently locked over the last couple of days. -- Solipsist 08:51, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image source

Thank you for uploading Image:Brawn usgp 2003.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Ellmist 04:58, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Basketball.jpg

Hey there. Image:Basketball.jpg is a great picture. Can you fill in some of the details about it? Such as the date, location, the teams, and the players in the picture, if any of these things are known. I'm a big fan of detailed captions. Thanks a lot & keep up the good work, Wile E. Heresiarch 05:43, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

panning

I just added your common-Image:M schumacher2.jpg picture of Michael Schumacher to the german article de:Mitziehen (panning). I guess you took this picture yourself, perhaps with a digital camera where exif data is saved with the image. I'd be curious (just for the panning-article) what the shutter speed was.
I try to check back this discussion; I you can't reply soon, please contact me at de:Benutzer Diskussion:Thire,
Thomas
PS: I like Image:Williams f1.jpg very much. Why isn't it on Wikimedia Commons?
--128.131.219.28 12:35, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in replying; my computer's power supply went out last week and I just got a new one yesterday. Anyway, I found the data for the image you inquired about and added the shutter speed (1/160th) to the de:Mitziehen article caption.

Rdikeman 19:10, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Jo, I saw it, thanks a lot! :) (Thomas) --128.131.219.28 22:16, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Alonso usgp 2004 pits.jpg

Hey, want to change this to GFDL-self or make it more clear that you are the author (assuming you are Rick Dikeman). It would make it easier and avoid the confusion of them getting marked for deletion according to the new no source policies. gren グレン 01:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was not familiar with that variation of GFDL; it is appropriate in this case, and I have made the change. Thanks!

Rdikeman 02:00, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball on Wikicities

Hello Rdikeman, Googie Man here and I'm writing to you because I'm very familiar with your pictures of baseball players on Wikipedia. Jimbo and Angela have made a new webstie called Wikicities. This link in particular will take you to the baseball Wikicity. As you'll see it's similar to Wikipedia, but my hope is this will allow baseball fans to do more and different things, like reporting on games, in depth statistics, create mulitple pages for pictures, and whatever else baseball fans care to create. You've done great work on Wikipedia and I was hoping you could help get this baseball Wikicity off the ground. Please let me know what you think either at my talk page, or you can email me at [email protected]. Thanks! Googie Man^(Talk), 22:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Day

POTD

Hi Rick,

Just to let you know that your photo Image:Baseball pitching motion 2004.jpg is due to make a reappearance as Picture of the Day on the 1st February. I've reused the same caption as last time, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/February 1, 2006. -- Solipsist 19:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... and Image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg is due up again tomorrow. I've changed the caption to be more relevant to Mark Webber as this photo no longer appears on Formula One, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/February 13, 2006. -- Solipsist 23:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Truly gorgeous pictures

I followed to your user pages from Image:Statue of liberty crown.jpg. Some featured images I see via your talk page. Nice! Just want to say Thanks and Cool! TransUtopian 16:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brian mcbride ffc 2005.jpg

Hi, this image was missing its licensing information. Since it appears you are the photographer, I've tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}}. You should go and update this to either {{GFDL-self}} or another compatible license (for example {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}). Thanks, BrownCow  (how now?) 17:24, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding Barnard's Lincoln

and the city of Mancchester. I was the one who wrote that and am about to double check myself. i swear that I don't have any fingers or toes crossed. later, Carptrash 23:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

whooooops

Cincinnati Lincoln dedicated on March 31, 1917
Manchester Lincoln unveiled on September 15, 1919
Louisville KY Lincoln on October 26, 1922

"Honest Abe" Barnstar Award

For your attention to the honest-to-goodness details that help wikipedia the reliable source of information that it has become, you are awarded this "Honest" Abraham Lincoln barn-star. "SMACK - SMACK" (a kiss on each cheek) Carptrash 01:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mighty Ducks

Thanks for the clarification, Rdikeman. Who would have thought that the two goalies would have the same number? lol thx again paat 22:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi Rdikeman,

My name is Fernanda Viégas and I have been studying Wikipedia for a while now (you can see a paper I published on the subject here). I would like to ask you a few questions about your activities as a Wikipedia "photographer" and "illustrator." I am fascinated by the pictorial side of Wikipedia and it would be great to hear about this community from one of its members. Would you be available for an email interview? Thanks, Fernanda.

CC-BY-SA

My dear and fellow Cincinnatian (I'm assuming);

I'm working on Wikitravel and was wondering if there would be any way you would make your photo of Cincinnati from N. KY. available under dual licenses GFDL and CC-BY-SA so we at Wikitravel could use your image on our article regarding Cincinnati [1]. Thanks. 71.72.212.152 21:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to share it anyway you like; what do I need to do for you?

Rdikeman 23:43, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not responding any sooner. If you want you can upload it here [2], however, you will have to create a user name. I normally check new additions every couple of days and will added it to the Cincinnati article. Or if you would like you can just add the CC-SA or CC-BY-SA disclaimer (I'm not sure how Wikipedia does it but on Wikitravel you can do this by writing {{Dual}} . For the legal jargon on Creative Commons please visit [3] Otherwise I'm certain it would suffice if you wrote "I release this image under GFDL and CC-BY-SA" on the image's page and that would give Wikitravel enough permission to use it. Would you like us to link back to your Wikipedia user page to give you credit or should we use a real name? Thanks! 71.72.212.152 09:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the CC-SA tag to the image. Use it in good health. ;-)

Rdikeman 01:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 71.72.212.152 05:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ingalls building cincinnati 2006.jpg

I've uploaded your picture of the Ingalls building to Commons. Hope it's ok? Theo06 11:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Carlos_reutemann.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carlos_reutemann.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gramophone record

Just out of curiosity, did you "fuzz out" the album cover on this photo? I liked it that way, although some didn't; it has been un-fuzzed by somebody, and I can't figure out how to put it back. - DavidWBrooks 12:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did -- in response to requests for "fair use rationale" for the image. I have decided to let others decide which version is more appropriate and acceptable. :-\ Rdikeman 12:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Nuxhall

Howdy, fellow Cincinnatian! I saw that you made Nuxxy's Wikipedia article, and I figured I'd enlist your help on keeping Wikipedians current on his cancer/pneumonia hospital stint. I've updated it recently, give it a look and let me know so far how it is. Rockhound 20:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg

Hi,

Is there any chance you can upload a higher resolution and higher quality version of your image of Mark Webber ?

I think it is a great photo, and I would like it to stay as a featured image, but by today’s featured image qualifications the resolution is too low, and it is too compressed. --Windsok 10:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The "original" is a 3072 x 2048 18Mb TIFF. What resolution/file size is appropriate?

Rdikeman 12:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am a believer that images should be uploaded in as high resolution as possible, so the full resolution would be great, I assume you have photoshop, so highish quality jpeg compression of it would be great. Thanks! --Windsok 13:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to oblige. It is now a 3072 x 1750 1.1 Mb JPEG. BTW, that Mark Webber article is quite a piece of work! Take care.

Rdikeman 16:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot mate. The Mark Webber article was rewritten by User:Albinomonkey, not me :) --Windsok 05:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photos?

Hey! I was just wondering how you are able to upload pictures on the wiki articles. I know that we need to prove copyright, but how does one do that? Any insight you could give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!! Bleach Babe 22:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To upload a photo, click the "Upload file" link on the left side of any page (maybe you knew that already). As far as copyright, I'm not a very good resource for understanding all the issues involved. Almost every picture I have uploaded was taken by me, so I just select "GFDL (self made)" as the Licensing type on the "Upload file" page.

The Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags page lists the options available to you.

HTH, Rdikeman 01:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Academic Freedom

Hi Rdikeman. I am writing a page of Academic Freedom in Wikipedia Spanish and I have used some of your text. While traducing the section of Academic Freedom of Professors, I think I found that the citations (ref) do not correspond to the text. Please, could you check them? PR 15:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)This is my nikename. My real name is Tasc, but it is already used by someone else in w:en. (please, send me an email with your response, since I am normally loaded in w:es). Regards, Tasc.[reply]

Template:F1 race report infobox

Since you seem to be the only other one actually using this template, I figured I'd ask you specifically, in addition to asking the wikiproject.

What do you think about combining the Template:F1 race report infobox with Template:F1 race report? Two of the info variables are already used in the infobox, and the remaining 4 could be copied straight from the F1 race report box at the bottom of said pages. The main reason I suggest, is that I saw a similar design at this page, and I though it looked nice. A design for my proposal is available at my sandbox. The two changes made: addition/merging of two templates, and widening of the template by 2 em. (The template was not originally designed with flagicons in mind, as such, longer names wrapped, causing the infobox to lengthen.) Let me know what y'all think. -slowpokeiv 15:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Questions

I noticed your name under some baseball card images and wondered if you could help me understand the copyright issue of adding images to articles. I wrote an article about my father Hap Moran and would like to add an image, but the photo I have in mind was obviously a PR photo taken by the New York Giants (football) but I seem to have the only copy and there are no credits on the back. In fact, when the book New York Giants 75 years was published, I was paid for the use of the photo (from 1930) and it was credited "Moran family collection." Also, I'd be interested in writing an article about the Diamond Matchbooks with football players on them from 1933 - 1938 - there is no copywrite on the covers, so being that old aren't they now in the public domain? I have a number of them on my website. I'm just not sure how these items fit into the categories I've read about image use on Wikipedia. Thanks. Revmoran 20:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revmoran, I am far from an expert on copyright issues; almost all of the images I upload are my own. I consider the baseball card images to be an example of Fair use, though I took the pictures of the cards. In the case of your photo of your father, it seems the Giants now consider you the copyright holder. That's a pretty strong case, as far as I can tell. It seems to me you could upload it with the Licensing option, "The copyright holder gave me permission to use this work in Wikipedia articles."

HTH, Rdikeman 20:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rick,

I am a new entrepreneur and I have a new product I'm developing related to baseball catchers. I came across your picture of a catcher in my research. I would like to use a portion of the picture on the product packaging. Just the actual catcher. I'm new at Wikipedia but from everything I could read it appears that the image is not copyrighted and I could copy the image. BUT, I want to do the right thing and not assume I can copy and/or use use the image without your permission. I am happy to give you credit as needed. I'm hoping this is the best way to communicate with you. I want to do my due diligence to get your permission and could not find contact information anywhere else. The summary of the article and image is as follows. Thanks!

Baseball catcher, 2004, by Rick Dikeman from en:Image:Baseball catcher.jpg 2004-05-18 07:11:47 Photo by en:User:Rdikeman, 2004.

Mr. Entrepreneur, Indeed, I appreciate your request for permission, but you are free to use the catcher image as you wish. All the best, Rdikeman 01:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rick,

Thank you for your timely response and permission to utilize the catcher image. I'm confident your kindness will come back to you. My sincere thanks! All the best to you! Mr. Entrepreneur —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.141.122 (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian McBride

Hello,

Could you put the picture of Brian McBride on Wikicommons? In that way the picture is available for all Wikipedia's over the world, so I can use it on the Dutch one! Roelzzz 11:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an account on Wikicommons. Certainly, anyone can snag the photo and upload it there.

Rdikeman 10:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Apple

Hey, letting you know I removed Image:Bigapple.jpg from Big Apple; see Talk:Big Apple. ~ PseudoSudo 03:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Clown chili peppers.jpg

I accidently reverted your image and now the clown has a sad face (seriously), please advise me how to revert it to the correct version sorry, Jaedza 23:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Lol! Is this the one you're looking for? Rdikeman 01:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's the one, I was scrolling with the middle mouse button and accidently left clicked and hit rev and it just reverted it to the sad face clown. Thanks for clearing that up. Jaedza 02:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

US Grand Prix reports

Hi Rdikeman, I notice that in several of the US Grand Prix reports, you have updated the results tables so that only the first instance of each constructor or engine is wikilinked. While this is standard Wikipedia practice, it's inconsistent with the remainder of the Grand Prix reports, where all instances of constructors and engines are wikilinked. Would you object if I updated the tables in the US Grand Prix reports to make them consistent with the other races? DH85868993 13:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel strongly about it, but my question would be, why not change the other reports to be consistent with standard Wikipedia practice? :-\

Rdikeman 14:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photography Question

Hi Rdikeman,

I am working on the Ohio Wesleyan University article and trying to get it to FA status in the near future. I was wondering if you might have some suggestions where I can get some advice on the images used in the article (specifically their quality and photography aspects). For example, we have two (though there are more in Wikimedia) of the University Hall (the Neoromanesque building currently featured in two photos) and I would like to get somebody's opinion on how to evaluate which one is better from a photography perspective. I am not sure how to evaluate them except for saying "I like A better than B". Can you help me? LaSaltarella 04:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I love photographs (as you apparently have noticed), I most often believe that less is more. Twenty-five images in one encyclopedia article is a bit many for me -- you're not covering the history of the Western world here. I would concentrate on those things that describe unique or exceptional features about OWU and its campus, and whittle the images down to, perhaps, five to eight. Sulphur Springs, Elliott Hall, University Hall (one or the other, I like the spring version better) are significant features to depict. Things only peripherally related to the school (Jackie Robinson's signing, the town of Delaware) should have their own articles where the pictures belong. Other things that are not unusual about this university (a lacrosse team, a new track surface, a football stadium) do not add anything to this article.

As for selecting one image over another, trust your instincts. I think in the case of University Hall, it's a pretty easy choice. A flowering tree in spring adds much more to the photo than a bare one mostly obscuring the photo's subject. HTH, Rdikeman 20:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Steve Howe

Good work on the references you added.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 22:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Hancock

Some questions have arisen around Image:Baseball pitching motion 2004.jpg. Specifically, who is the baseball player featured? The image has been reversed and altered, and so there is some doubt about whether or not it is of Josh Hancock. If you could explain on the image's page when and where the image was taken, who it was taken of, and what manipulations where done to this image, I would greatly appreciate it. Rklawton 23:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The description on the Image page (Pitcher's motion, Brandon Claussen (image is reversed), Cincinnati Reds, 9/15/2004, by Rick Dikeman) is correct. Rdikeman 21:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Could you go ahead and update the image to the unaltered version? I think it would be preferable, and it wouldn't affect its use in any of the articles. Rklawton 23:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded the "non-reversed" version as Image:Baseball_pitching_motion_2004r.jpg. The image had been moved to Wikimedia Commons and I didn't have an account there until just now, so I am not allowed to replace the existing image yet. :-\ If you would like to remedy that and are authorized, feel free. Rdikeman 01:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the image has been delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures per Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Baseball pitching motion 2004.jpg but it seems that you were not notified of the nomination for delisting. Please let me know if you would like to address the concerns voiced there. --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baseball_pitching_motion_2004r.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baseball_pitching_motion_2004r.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Prophet of the sandlots cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prophet of the sandlots cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US GP Reports

Hi. I notice that you made some massive improvements to the race reports for United States grands prix, very well done on that score. However, I notice that you make quite frequent use of the blockquote formatting and I am curious as to what these sections are actually quoting. If these are direct, verbatim quotes from the published sources which you cite at the bottom of each article then we could well be in trouble from a copyright infringement, as these are not transcriptions of speech, but composed prose and as such may be copyright of the original author/publisher. Of course, if you have just used the blockquote as a highlighting method then that is different, but you need to confirm exactly what you have done. Thanks! Pyrope 12:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the formatting technique to which you refer is intended only to highlight, and in addition to sourcing my contributions as well as I know how (almost always with at least two sources), I have worked hard to paraphrase and blend the content of those sources in the text. That is my confirmation that I have not "quoted" any sources improperly; please let me know if this does not satisfy your concern. Thanks for your attention! Rdikeman 17:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that all sounds fine. A perfect example of my preferred sourcing method. I find that people who assiduously cite every single line tend not to do a very good job of forming a coherent text. Nice work! Pyrope 13:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Home run

We now have an editor who insists on removing this photo from the Home Run article, on the grounds that it is not clear whether McGwire is actually hitting a home run on that swing. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. Since you uploaded the photo, I wonder if you could clear up this little mystery. Thank you! Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 02:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was taken during a Saturday afternoon game against Detroit on July 14, 2001. It depicts McGwire's 10th home run of the season and 564th of his career, moving him ahead of Reggie Jackson for sixth on the all-time list. HTH, Rdikeman 23:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now it can resume its proper place on the Home run page, if it's not already back there. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 23:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Francois_cevert.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Francois_cevert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 16:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Francois_cevert.jpg

Hi Rick,

First, thank you for contributing so many of your own professional photos of auto racing. They are an asset.

The image Image:Francois_cevert.jpg is under a deletion review and I wanted to ask if it possibly was yours? If so, and it is under a free license, then the image can be saved. If not, it still can be saved under a free use license.

If possible, would you please consider contributing info about the status of the image to the deletion review? The discussion is at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2007_September_17#Image:Francois_cevert.jpg.

Cordially, -- Guroadrunner 17:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prophet of the sandlots cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Prophet of the sandlots cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer Kimball

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Spencer Kimball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lp record album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lp record album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tkaa cover the who.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tkaa cover the who.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perryville battle maps

Hal,

Outstanding job with the diagrams to accompany the Battle of Perryville article. I've been there and have read a couple of books about the battle; it's not an easy one to get a handle on and your maps greatly enhance the impact of the article.

Thanks!

Thanks, and you're welcome. I drew these after visiting the battlefield (see http://www.posix.com/CW07/#Perryville) and I wish I had done them before because I think I missed some key understandings there. I hope to go back some day and iterate the maps. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Baseball card reverse side.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 01:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Clements Photo

If you Can make the Clements Photo a Yankee one becouse he Has had more experience on the Yanks Then the Astros but He was on The Sox For 12 years Count druckula (talk) 02:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Union_station_interior.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Union_station_interior.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Federal_hall.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Federal_hall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Supreme_court.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Supreme_court.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rear_wing_f1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rear_wing_f1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Rick wakeman on stage with cape.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rick wakeman on stage with cape.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ichiro.jpg

You might want to inform the operator of this page that your image was uploaded under GFDL licensing. They are effectively redistributing the image without the abiding the requirement that you as the principal author be listed (ref:Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License#4. MODIFICATIONS. Jappalang (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Ichiro.jpg

File:Ichiro.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ichiro.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Ichiro.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usgp 2001 ims montoya leads schumacher.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Usgp 2001 ims montoya leads schumacher.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cincinnati

I've been working on some Cincinnati related architects and buildings if you're interested. I'm not that familiar with the area. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Francois cevert.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Francois cevert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strawberry fields.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strawberry fields.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Carnegie lib 640 03.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carnegie lib 640 03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Ntl undgrnd rr frdm ctr.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ntl undgrnd rr frdm ctr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Clown chili peppers.jpg

(Probably) One of your images, File:Clown chili peppers.jpg, has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Common Good (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sportsman urn.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sportsman urn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for this, it is a heartwarming photo Lotje (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrigley_field_720.jpg!

Hi Rick.

Yesterday I found that your Wrigley_field_720.jpg was cropped and printed in an italian puzzle magazine.
Might it be a violation?
Here you can view the scanned copy of this paper magazine:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/183538841/Settimana-Enigmistica-4259-del-9-Novembre-2013

Your photo appears at page 5.
It is the most popular crossword magazine in Italy.
If you need a higher resolution I can send you it.
All the best
Piero

PS: I am not a Wikipedian, that is why I am using your User_talk page. 11:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Symbol

What does mean the symbol __FORCETOC__ there? Why there is it?--Unikalinho (talk) 17:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The yes album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The yes album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 ^Talk 02:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RickDikeman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RickDikeman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grapefruit League pic

Hi! Was your photo of Commons:File:Spring training.jpg taken in 1994 or 2004? Both dates appear in the file description, it's a bit confusing. Thanks in advance! Beisbol (talk) 07:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RickDikeman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jon anderson 1978.jpg

Hi Rick. Thank you for your recent edit to 1959 United States Grand Prix. I noticed the image File:Jon anderson 1978.jpg which you uploaded. The image description indicates the photo was taken in 1977. Should the image be named "File:Jon anderson 1977.jpg" instead? If it should, I'm happy to do the work to get the change made. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 10:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the image to be renamed; all being well, that should occur within the next 24 hours or so and a bot will update all links. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 12:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been renamed and the links updated. Thanks for your help. DH85868993 (talk) 20:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1982 United States Grand Prix West

Hello! It appears that, many years ago, you added blockquotes into this article. But there is no reference specifying where they come from. Do you recall where you took them from? Regards, Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zwerg Nase. Thanks for the inquiry. Indeed, I added race reports to many of the Formula One race articles more than ten years ago. It was my style to highlight sections of the race descriptions using the blockquote tag; they are not intended to represent "quotes," per se. I have received comments and questions many times about this formatting choice. Some people really like it, some not so much. My references, not footnoted, are now listed as "Further Reading." Thanks.

RickDikeman (talk) 23:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good to know. I will probably go over all of the 1982 race reports once I am done with season article. If you have some free time on your hands, maybe you could take a look at the sections of that article that I have already edited (everything bar the actual season summary) and tell me what you think? Cheers! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed your extensive work on the 1982 season article. Outstanding job! Keep up the great work. :-)

RickDikeman (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) I have now continued working on it, taking care of the first season summary section. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Phoenix street circuit simple map 1989-90.gif

The file File:Phoenix street circuit simple map 1989-90.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Phoenix street circuit simple map 1991.gif

The file File:Phoenix street circuit simple map 1991.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dallas fair park circuit simple map.gif

The file File:Dallas fair park circuit simple map.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RickDikeman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Football in Bloomington, Indiana, 1996.jpg

First of all, congratulations on such a high-quality and widely used image. I have been trying to identify the player with the ball, and I am 99% sure it is Chris Klein. If it was in Bloomington then the team in red must be the Hoosiers. According to this page, Klein wore the No. 10 shirt in 1996 (and in 1995 as well[4]). Do you concur? St Anselm (talk) 01:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your question about my photo of Indiana University Men's Soccer versus Butler University. It seems, on inspection, that this photo was taken on November 19, 1995 (https://iuhoosiers.com/sports/mens-soccer/schedule/1995), not in 1996. I remember Indiana losing to Butler in the NCAA Tournament that day and me congratulating the father of the Butler goalkeeper, who happened to be standing next to me. With that recollection, I do agree that Indiana player number 10 in my photo is Chris Klein who wore number 10 in 1995, as you found. Thanks for your diligence in improving Wikipedia; if you are able to change the image file name to indicate the correct year, please feel free to do so. Thanks! RickDikeman (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I have adjusted some captions and submitted a filename move request at Commons. St Anselm (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did you make the Pic on the Soccer/Football Site?

or better Was this a normal game? Olidikser (talk) 01:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]