User talk:Reynolds89

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Reynolds89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Herostratus (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re Charles Feltman[edit]

Let's not edit war over this, I've made my case at Talk:Charles Feltman, and invite you to make your case. Bring JohnsonWales along if you want. Herostratus (talk) 05:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Charles Feltman, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You need to engage on the talk page, see Talk:Charles Feltman. Message me if you don't know how to do this or have any questions. Please don't use use more than one account, thanks. Herostratus (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Charles Feltman.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. On consideration of the fact that you've actually been edit warring for a while on this (see WP:EDITWAR) and that you appear to be using multiple accounts, I've bumped up your warning level Herostratus (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Charles Feltman. Herostratus (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reynolds89, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Herostratus (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Charles Feltman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Herostratus (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Herostratus (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note this Confirmed sock block.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]