User talk:Renzoy16/Archivebox 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Percentage in Live Shows

Terrence, the percentage shows how strong is the Artist compared to the ones who are in Bottom two. If this is not important, the host of the show will not mention it on the Live Show. So, please -- leave it. Ok? --polmags (talk)

Hi! Thanks sa updates sa PBB ALL IN :))

PBB ALL IN

Ok let me clear it out for you, last night the housemates were labeled as Housemate A, Housemate B, Housemate C, Housemate D and Housemate E with Loisa going home with 0.99% as she was also revealed as Housemate D. However, after the episode official twitter of ABS-CBN revealed that

Housemate A, Housemate B, Housemate C, Housemate D and Housemate E were Jane, Daniel, Maris, Loisa and Vickie respectively. It was also shown in the beginning of the Big Night episode.

But then you put Housemate B with the highest vote which is so incorrect as it was Housemate A who got the highest net vote at that time that's why i'm changing it, same with the S-E voting result.

Clearly you're the one who's putting wrong information here not me. Go ahead and report me, I have my evidences to prove it.

PBB All In

https://twitter.com/abscbndotcom/status/503225991884320768 https://twitter.com/PBBabscbn/status/503221507468693506

Here you go. The proper placements of the Housemates last eviction night as posted by the official team of ABS-CBN and the show handler herself.

Orphaned non-free image File:Crowdtilt logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crowdtilt logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Paid Editing/Nofel Izz

Hi. As it was fairly recent, you may not be aware that Wikipedia's Terms of Use were changed on June 15. As a result, it is now necessary under the new rules that anyone being paid to edit on behalf of a client must disclose that relationship. You have a few options as to how - you can make a declaration in the edit summaries, add a statement to the talk page of the article, or you can add a statement to your user page. The disclosure needs to include your employer, your client, and the manner in which you are affiliated, although the "employer" is clearly not relevant when you are doing freelance work. This won't prevent you from doing paid editing work, but is intended to meet the requirements for transparency within the project. For more information, the Terms of Use will help, as will the accompaning FAQ. As far as I'm aware, you haven't made a declaration along those lines in regard to Nofel Izz, so if you plan to continue to edit on his behalf you will need to clarify your relationship with the subject. - Bilby (talk) 03:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bb. Pilipinas logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bb. Pilipinas logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:I Do Village.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I Do Village.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

PBB

PBB

Hello, I think you're the one who's putting wrong info's in the page, for example, Jane who got the highest vote last time is "Housemate A and not Housemate B as you post in the page, plus it shouldn't be hidden anymore who got the votes last night cause it was shown at the beginning of the finale. Sorry to say but you're the one who's putting wrong information. Jayven09maddie (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homeostatic capacity, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress and Stimuli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Battles PH season two stage.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Battles PH season two stage.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pope Francis' visit to the Philippines

On 6 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pope Francis' visit to the Philippines, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during his recent visit to the Philippines, Pope Francis said mass before a record gathering of six million people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pope Francis' visit to the Philippines. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bookboon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bookboon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —George8211 / T 11:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

hi can you send me some actual spelling errored articles?

hi can you send me some actual spelling errored articles? bye Superkid761 (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice Kids (Philippines season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Something

Look Renzoy16 I'm Sorry for attacking you you are the great editor in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vince daryl falcunitin (talk • contribs) 02:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your Face Sounds Familiar (Philippines season 1)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Your Face Sounds Familiar (Philippines season 1), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://pinoy247tambayan.blogspot.com/2015/04/your-face-sounds-familiar-april-18-2015.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 00:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ServerCentral official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ServerCentral official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DolarToday logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DolarToday logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

autopatrolled user right

Hi Renzoy16, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Katie^talk 20:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Another COIN discussion

Editors are assuming that you were paid to edit once again. Since you didn't respond to the last COIN discussion, it's hard to argue otherwise: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Conley_family. --Ronz (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Conley family

Category:Conley family, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nimbo (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimbo (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbo (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 15:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

wadi hanifa

dear/maam pleas inform my wife merlinda tiwanac too call me or access any contact for me/if ever she didnot cooperiat/in these comin monday i will fill departatio in p.o.e.a or owwa,in what reason blocking me. pleas [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.210.121.250 (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Stocktrek Images.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Stocktrek Images.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Virtual Staff Finder logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Staff Finder logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre

The article Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:94.205.243.210

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terra^★ 07:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaun Bonétt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Ignatius College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Disclosing on the articles you worked on

Hi Renzoy16 - thanks very much for being open about your paid editing on your User page. Would you please go back over the articles you wrote for pay, and place and complete the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template at the top of each Talk page. I was going to do it, but you really should, since you are the one making money. It would be good if you put this on the Talk page when you were creating the article, at the same time you list it on your Talk page. Please let me know if you will take care of this going backwards, as well as forwards. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Removal of landfall of Typhoon Nona

I noticed the removal of these event from 2015 in the Philippines, the landfall of Typhoon Nona (Melor), which is major. Is that minor or removed it by mistake?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Voice Indonesia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Voice Indonesia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Two threads are now open on your editing. - Brianhe (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Shaun Bonétt

Hi Renzoy16. The subject article, and related articles, have an extensive history of paid editing. You have disclosed paid editing on other articles, per your Userpage. For some reason you have gotten involved at the subject article; you have said that you are not getting paid to work on it.

here are your contributions to that article. your first edit introduced a bunch of promotional content, and quotes that are too long for fair use that contain yet more promotion, and took away the tags. This is a classic paid editing job. And on the talk page, you have pushed to get rid of the tags. Again, this is often the assignment, in paid editing work.

You have been a good citizen to a certain extent, and I appreciate that. But your activity on this article contradicts your assertion. Would you please reconsider your disclosure on this article?

If you are indeed not getting paid, I would strongly advise you to walk away from this article, as what you are doing there in the context of a statement that you are not getting paid, is seriously harming your reputation.

Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog, please look at the article before I edited it. How can you say that I introduced promotional content when I rewrote what a series of suspected paid advocates added to that article, removing much of what could be deemed promotional? The quotes were only used within the references to ensure that the sentences in the article were verifiable and the words of the author, not those of suspected paid advocates who previously edited the article. Using authors' words from the references, rather than my own, can hardly be seen as promotional. As for the tag, you were the one who told me that paid advocates should be using {{connected contributor (paid)}} so I even added it on the talk page for the previous editors that duffbeerforme suspected were paid. What I did was I just simply removed the {{COI}} tag from the main article and added the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template to the talk page. I think both of these tags serve the same purpose and there is no need for both. If you can look at my revision, I actually left the {{advert}} tag on the article and thought it would be best to keep it there until Wiae would be done working on it.

AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

That talks around the issue, Renzoy. Wikipedia is vast; it is hard to understand why you are working on this specific article and focused on the exact same things as the paid editors who worked on this before you, were focused on. The quotes you added were blatantly promotional. This is not a subtle thing. Look, I am giving you a chance to change your disclosure, and if you will not do that, the suggestion to just walk away. You will do as you will do. And so will I. Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The issue is not a critical one, but I was pursuing it to highlight that tags should not be an editor’s only purpose and that we need to do more. The tag can stay, but the article should be "cleaned."AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 14:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

You continue to dodge the question. Why are you working on this article? Jytdog (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Terms of use

Hi Renzoy16. About a month ago, I left you a note asking you to disclose on the article Talk pages of articles that you have already edited for pay. I see you didn't respond to that.

More importantly, the terms of use require not just that you disclose that you have edited for pay, but that you disclose your "employer, client, and affiliation" for each edit you make for pay. You have not disclosed that anywhere, and you are currently in violation of the Terms of Use. I suggest that you take care of that before you continue editing. There are admins who will block for this kind of consistent violation of the Terms of Use.

Paid editors have a place in the community, but you need to follow the Terms of Use, as well as the policies and guidelines. Please do get into compliance. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog. Oh. Sorry, I forgot that one out. I tried adding one of that template in one of the articles I have created but I have stopped after due to some errands. I forgot to finish that after my errands. Regarding mostly of my old clients, I don't know who they were since they were only given to me by someone whom I also didnt knew. It's like a job that had been contracted out. I'll try to recover my online freelance job account and see if I can trace some of the other employers. Thanks.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The amendment to the terms of use requiring disclosure came into effect on June 16, 2014. For paid edits you made after that, disclosure is mandatory, and "I don't know" is not an option. Jytdog (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

You have not updated your disclosures yet. Jytdog (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your editing on the following articles also appears to be paid editing jobs that were not disclosed:

You cannot do this halfway. You need to disclose completely and carefully if you are going to maintain the trust of the community. Jytdog (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)