User talk:ReachingtheStars

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for the company.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for the company.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of White Lotus Tea Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on White Lotus Tea Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about White Lotus Tea Club

Hello, ReachingtheStars,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether White Lotus Tea Club should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Lotus Tea Club .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barbara Brickner

Hello ReachingtheStars,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Barbara Brickner for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kansiime (talk) 04:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Walker (artist)

Hello ReachingtheStars,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Walker (artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 19:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about David Walker (artist)

Hello, ReachingtheStars,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether David Walker (artist) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Walker (artist) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 11:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Tony Horton (exercise instructor)

Hello, I'm Ronz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Resorts World Bimini

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Resorts World Bimini, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Benton (anchorman)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dave Benton (anchorman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Dave Benton (anchorman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Benton (anchorman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Benton (anchorman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Lenhardt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Lenhardt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

you asked about this at the Teahouse. The article shows no indication of significance except for being head of the company, and is therefore covered adequately by being mentioned in the company article. To justify a separate article, you would need references providing substantial coverage about him specifically from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. This in practice is not a easy requirement to meet for business executives. DGG ( talk ) 08:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Barbara Brickner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Brickner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Brickner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Yoni Freedhoff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoni Freedhoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoni Freedhoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Computer Engineer Barbie

Hi: Thanks for uploading an image of the doll set to Commons. However, it cannot be copyright free since the doll set itself is commercially copyrighted. The fact that you took it from a Flickr image where the photographer waived copyright to the photo does not change that. It needs instead to be uploaded to en.wikipedia, with a fair use rationale for this one article. I hope you do this as soon as possible; the article will indeed be better with a picture.

Also, the article does not require an infobox; kindly do not add one. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi again, thanks for uploading the picture again here with an appropriate licence! However, I note that the person who initially left your note on my talk page was Brightideas191, and your accounts were started on the same day, and you have similar user pages. Is that another account owned by the same person, or do you both use the same computer, or what? If you are two people sharing the same computer, you should both declare it somewhere on either your user pages or your talk pages. See WP:ROOMMATE. I was thinking there was a template available, but it seems there's only a userbox. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Question about logos

I want to know if I am allowed to make small changes to a logo before I put it up on its corresponding wiki article? If I can make the changes (I am talking about taking out some words from the bottom of the logo, but leaving the design and name of the company) do I still site the same source for the logo on the upload wizard, or do I need to say its now from me, since I made some changes? Thanks,ReachingtheStars (talk) 07:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

You would need to acknowledge the source where you got the logo from before editing it, but you would also need to say that you've made changes to the image, so people who can see that it's different from the source image will understand why that is. Nick (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Esther V. Yanai

The article Esther V. Yanai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

inadequate references for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Esther V. Yanai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esther V. Yanai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther V. Yanai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of A.J. Davis (criminal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A.J. Davis (criminal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.J. Davis (criminal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)