User talk:Rblack2001

Welcome!

Hello, Rblack2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 06:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ani DiFranco

Per wp:verifiability, this statement: Her mentor was famed American folk singer and song writer Pete Seeger. should be referenced or removed. See help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138:First, this is my first time using a talk page so I might not be doing this correctly. I appreciate your comment and concern. I'm not sure what to cite as a source as Ms. DiFranco has stated Pete Seeger was a mentor during numerous concerts I attended. I imagine I was not, by chance, at every concert during which she made this statement.

Also, there is the piece published in the Wall Street Journal Jan. 28, 2014 - the day following Seeger's death - titled "Things Pete Seeger Taught Me" which you can read here ^[1]

This is one of the many things she said of her relationship with Seeger: "Within our camaraderie was the essential relationship of teacher and student. I learned a heck of a lot from him about being a folksinger and an activist. In our every interaction there was a lesson and I payed close attention."

There is also the following quote floating around the Internet - which seems to originate @ mtv - “I think that my one grain of wisdom in my life, which serves me well, is that when I meet a great teacher, I follow them,” DiFranco said. “I invent excuses to be near them. Whether it’s Pete, Utah Phillips, or Sekou Sundiata, it’s made my life pretty great along the way.”

There are literally hundreds of other places where it is noted Seeger was a mentor to DiFranco. Of course I don't think these can be cited as they are just statements of fact without citing any sources.

If we want to say "During live performances and in an article DiFranco wrote which was published by The Wall Street Journal the day after Seeger died . . . " but that kind of seems like overkill.

So let me know what you think. Rblack2001 (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk addition is outstanding. The WSJ article I think would be sufficient. Sources need to be published by RS. wp:biographies of living persons (BLP) information references are deemed very important. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: Hi. So, I'm not sure where this leaves me - mostly because I don't know what "sources need to be published by RS" means (I do not know what RS is). I can add the reference to The Wall Street Journal article and leave out her mentioning Seeger in her live shows if you think that best.

Thanks.

Rblack2001 (talk) 04:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RS = wp:Reliable sources. Add a help:footnotes reference of the WSJ article to the information.

Regarding information being stated on a tv show: If you can cite a show, date, etc, you can use template:cite episode. Care is needed citing wp:YouTube Much preferable if it is posted by a reputable news source. Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes: "~~~~" Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you did sign... Moved it above my talk. Jim1138 (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2014/01/28/ani-difranco-things-pete-seeger-taught-me/

@Jim1138: OK - I reworded the sentence re: Seeger being a mentor and added a citation. It appears as footnote #6. I'm not going to cite a show where DiFranco made the comment as I think the WSJ is enough - and, sadly, I did not save my ticket stubs. And, since they were live shows on not a TV show, etc., I have no "proof" that she made the statement. Anyway, I think it works the way it is. If not let me know.

Rblack2001 (talk) 05:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Riverdale

Hi. Your removal of the cast information and addition of Although set in what looks like an all-American town and filled with characters named after those in the Archie comic book series, Riverdale is more like The Killing or Pretty Little Liars with its numerous wardrobe changes and dark undertones reminiscent of David Lynch. is entirely unsourced, and based entirely on your own observations, which violates WP:V and WP:OR. I would recommend self-reverting, and starting a discussion by listing your sources for these additions. Cheers. -- Alex^TW 04:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm still rather new to talk pages so I hope I'm doing this correctly.

I sought to remove the first large paragraph of cast information simply because in the next section of the article there is even greater-detailed cast information. In other words, listing casting information in two consecutive sections seems unnecessary. Something descriptive of the show in the second paragraph, IMHO, might be more more likely to keep people reading. Too much detail high up can be confusing.

As far as how I described the show, I know I should have cited sources. But, honestly, I was too tired at the time to find the references. I know that is not the right attitude and I apologize.

Rblack2001 (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rblack2001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your thought on Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories

Hi, I saw your comment within your edit summary:

"I also wonder whether Wikipedia wants to state whether these theories are true or false - instead of just reporting the facts. Just a thought."

It's a reasonable question, and one that has come up before, so I added it to the FAQ for the article. I'd appreciate if you could give it a look and see if it's a reasonable response. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not create a user page?

Hi wikifriend,

First I must say welcome. There is so much to do here and it's great having you volunteer to share knowledge.

Your user page has a name like this: User:Example. Its normal use is to give basic information, if you wish, about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although it helps other users know more about you, you don't have to say anything about yourself. You may wish to create a user page on Meta so that it will display on all Wikimedia projects where you have not created a local user page. You may click my username to see what is obtainable. (I'll love to know the inspiration behind your username though)

I'm a 21 year old human. You could drop me a message on my talk page or Wiki mail me for any questions or issues around Wikipedia. I could gladly adopt you. You may also get help from the rich resources here and here as well.

Page history

You can see the order of edits on most any page by clicking on the "View history" tab at the top of the page. See wp:page history for details. It appears your mysterious guest was 70.48.43.247 (talk) who has been blocked for six months. (click on the IP for edit history, and talk for the talk page). 70.48.43.247 was blocked for 36 hours last month. See 70.48.43.247's the anon's logs.

Anyway, I don't think you need to do anything. The blocker was Berean Hunter The Checkuser block means the anon (anon refers to a user not logged in) was blocked before at another IP (i.e. wp:sockpuppet) and likely is a reoccurring problem. Jim1138 talk 20:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rblack2001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2014/01/28/ani-difranco-things-pete-seeger-taught-me/

[1]