User talk:Rawrman7575

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Gigi Dolin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gigi Dolin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if you aren't sure who zachary wentz is, he got released from wwe cause he dressed up like hitler and did the nazi salute. there's no excuse for that and there relationship shouldn't be shown off/told about Rawrman7575 (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it's true and verifiable why shouldn't it be written? Aaron Liu (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

then you gotta tell the hitler part of zach don't leave it out. it's true and verifiable Rawrman7575 (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unless a source also mentions these next to each other, that'll be WP:SYNTH. In any case, there's no reason it should be removed. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

now you're just contradicting yourself Rawrman7575 (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How? Zachary Wentz's relationship with Gigi Dolin is a standalone fact and has no reason to not be written if it's true and verifiable. The Hitler part, if true and verifiable, also is, STANDALONE. However you can't place these next to each other unless the source does that per WP:SYNTH. This is to avoid adding implications when there isn't one. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Gigi Dolin, you may be blocked from editing. You have not provided a reason why this stuff should be removed. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rawrman7575! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gigi Dolin. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 00:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it wasn't vandalizing. literally google it it's why he got released Rawrman7575 (talk) 00:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. You have not provided an inline source and this is a Wikipedia:Biography of a living person. 2. See my reply about SYNTH above. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this doesn't involve you Rawrman7575 (talk) 01:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How so? This is the same subject. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i could literally show you a pic of zach doing a nazi salute and you'd be like "AcCoRdInG ToO WiKIpEdIa THaTs NoT CrEDiBlE" Rawrman7575 (talk) 02:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It can be credible if 1. you back it up by citing an article that says zach's hitler stuff 2. it stands alone, not together with another sentence to imply a conclusion. You can only put these together if you have a source that puts them together.
This is because we can't have WP:Original Research, which is because Wikipedia editors aren't academically credible 90% of the time and can often come up with wrong facts. If we allow original research our credibility will plummet. Putting two independent facts together to imply a conclusion is also original research since the conclusion is new. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving you a little break so you can read up on WP:SECONDARY and WP:RS, because if you keep going like this, making edits that have no sources or totally unreliable sources, and then fighting with other editors when they call you on it, you are just going to get blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 02:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

literally all this website is now is it's just fulfilled by toxic moderators who always remove content that they think it’s wrong no matter actually they don’t understand the topic. every time i've tried putting updated information on here it gets removed. if you block me you're only proving my point. Rawrman7575 (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unreliable sources? I've literally made a source of Drew McIntyre himself saying he's 275 lbs and y'all came at me saying it's not reliable Rawrman7575 (talk) 07:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, like @Hunterb212 said, you need to cite it inline. You listed a link in the edit summary but didn't update the source. And even then, notice how the box you changed says Billed Weight, which means the weight they’re listed at, not their actual weight. Additionally, you removed the names and height for no reason.
Also, your block has already expired. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you clearly don't watch wwe. samantha irvin the ring announcer even says he's 275. goodbye i'm done Rawrman7575 (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not billed online or recorded in a secondary source anywhere. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]