User talk:Rahulmothiya/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Thank you

Thank you for your warming welcome (talk)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar! utcursch | talk 11:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Reverting

Please do not revert common-sense edits that remove pointless information, as you did at Bow, London. Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, but please be more careful. A lot of your reverts don't help (eg No. 228 Squadron RAF). Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 15:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hi Rahulmothiya. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Juan Alfonso de la Cerda, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Jac16888 ^Talk 17:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rahulmothiya. You have new messages at Jac16888's talk page.
Message added 17:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jac16888 ^Talk 17:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Marvin Knopp

Hello Rahulmothiya, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Marvin Knopp, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 19:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Rahulmothiya

Thanks for send "barnstar" for me..Welcome... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahamed5zal (talk • contribs) 08:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

--ProudPakhtun-Wrora (talk) 20:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)== Bogus Editing == please stay away from bogus editing the Pashtuns page as the Joshua Project is a highly unreliable source and the goverment Stats are more reliable also Fyi Pashtun or Pakhtun means a Person who speaks Pashto as his or her mother tongue and clearly India does not have a considerable Pakhtun community. and since when do Indians care about a Pashtun article, Please stay away from editing as it is not your area of concern. It would make more sense for an Afghan, pakistani or even Iranian to be concerned with the article .

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. You recently passed Nanjing Ninghai Middle School as OK for inclusion. I'm just pointing out that this school has no references other than one to its own Chinese language web site, and I'm curious to know why you consider it does not require any maintenance tags. Perhaps you can let me know. Thanks, and happy patrolling! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. You recently applied maintenance tags to Moviesuptodate.in. I'm just pointing out that on the creator's own admission, this web site does not exist yet, and I'm curious to know why you consider it does not require a CSD tag. Perhaps you can let me know. Thanks, and happy patrolling! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. You recently applied a category to Welcome 2012. I'm curious to know why you consider it did not require a CSD tag. Perhaps you can let me know. Thanks, and happy patrolling! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I'm just letting you know that your CSD A5 on سوجوک در ایران because this criterion does not apply to this kind of page. If you are not sure how to tag new pages, please be sure to read WP:NPP, and if you need any help, don't hesitate to let me know. Happy patrolling!

New Page Patrolling

I just realised that I declined your application yesterday at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback with a mention about your page patrolling. By all means continue to fight vandalism, but please do not patroll any new pages until you are more familiar with policies. Perhaps you would like to consider improving or creating articles for a while - new page patrol is probably not the easiest place for beginners to start working. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Improper use of warning templates

You issued a "Final Warning" for this edit on the Film Socialisme article. Not only is this a clear violation of the Assume Good Faith principle - this was not overtly a case of vandalism - but it was completely inappropriate to use a "Final Warning" for this single edit. If you continue to abuse the warning templates, you run the risk of your privileges being revoked.

Have a look through WP:DNB before you issue any more warnings, and be careful about your interactions with newcomers. Little Professor (talk) 12:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Film Socialisme. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Little Professor (talk) 13:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Ahem

Would you care to explain [1]? I can find no nomination for this page which is required, you do not have the experience yourself to judge a Good Article per our standards and would you like to tell why you decided to revert my removal of the tag without any explanation? As I have already said to you, and I'm not the only one, please slow down your editing and familiarise yourself more with our guidelines --Jac16888 ^Talk 14:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Josh Ryan page entry

I have provided sources now. Can the flag be removed from this page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbz030 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey Cbz030

Hey , I have checked the Sources and references . all are correct . but i have added 1 more para to the biography retrieved from bio section from official website . and yes , in the birthdate section of Infobox , Citation or source is needed because birthday & date is not written on official Website . Thanxx for the co-operation --  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 06:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

RKD

Hello, your "outdated" tagging of the page Otto Hoynck indicates that you have more recent information about this painter. As the RKD is generally considered to be the most regularly updated and most definitive source for painters born in the Netherlands, please list your sources on the talk page so that the RKD can be improved. Tagging the article is not constructive. Thanks, Jane (talk) 14:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Rahulmothiya. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for File:Persepolis_Teheran_Logo.JPG, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Images do not qualify for F10 deletion. v/r - TP 17:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

re: Dennis hibler

I noticed you took the article Dennis hibler to AfD. The article was tagged with a Biography of Living Persons PROD and there was really no need to go to AfD at that point, since a BLP prod is a deletion process in and of itself. Safiel (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok , I respect u n ur statement , This is the first time i tagged any article for AFD & I am in learning process of Wikipedia Rules & Guidelines. Well , 10nxx for your Notification . -  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 06:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Adding a photo

Hello again. Can you assist me with adding a photo to the Josh Ryan page? thanks. I didn't pull any info from his official website yet because he tells me he will be updating it soon. I'll update his wiki entry more at that time. I'll also see if he can add his birthdate to his site to make it official. Cbz030 (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

If its a free Image then u can upload it to the Wikimedia Commons or you can too add a request at Wikipedia:Files for upload . If you need more help , feel free to talk to me. Thanx
--  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 08:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling

Hi Rahulmothiya. We appreciate your patrolling new pages but you haven't been here very long and tagging pages is something that we have to get done right. I'm asking you now to stop tagging pages and warning other users until you have more experience with editing, and are more familiar with our policies. Please read WP:NPP, WP:DELETION, and WP:CSD, and WP:PROD. If you have any questions or need help understanding the policies, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page, and when you think you are ready to patrol pages again, please let me know. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Also, please do not place welcome templates on the talk pages of registered users who have not yet edited or who have made very few edits - for all we know, they may be vandals or sockpuppets, and we don't want to encourage them until we know more about the kind of edits they make. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok , its fyn , Now I understand ! but what abut my application on Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback . As , u too know that I am continously fighting against Vandalism , Unsourced or unreferenced Contents and tagging with appropriate tags to the newly created articles . I know I am new & currently experiencing the Wikipedia & need more Guide & Coaching from you . -  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 16:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

If you didn't find it already, the main-page handling deletions is located here; you will find a part about tagging there. I would advise to start out with tagging speedy-deletions (located here), though, and take it easy, acquaint yourself with the details...

Lectonar (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

 

Speedy deletion nomination of Ankan Sen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ankan Sen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 09:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeetumoni Kalita

A tag has been placed on Jeetumoni Kalita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 09:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeetumoni Kalita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeetumoni Kalita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeetumoni Kalita until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ankan Sen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankan Sen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankan Sen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of schools in Jaipur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of schools in Jaipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of schools in Jaipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 09:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: to your message on my talk page

Your Message - Quote " Hello Arunsingh16. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however, regarding Jeetumoni Kalita, that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), pure vandalism (G3), and copyright violations (G12) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 12:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)" Qnquote.

Hello, Rahulmothiya. You have new messages at Arunsingh16's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ved Prakash Arya & Atul Kasbekar‎

A tag has been placed by you on two of the articles I have written. You have citied

when both the articles have multiple sources and are of well known personnel in India. Please cite valid reasons for tagging the articles. Just because I tagged one / more article created by you for deletion, it does not mean that you also "get back" at me. I have tagged over dozen articles for deletion today and reported over two dozen vandals. That does not mean that all the people have to take it personally. Regards AKS (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jeetumoni Kalita. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  03:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Good Articles

With this edit you classed an article as being good. For an article to be given good status it must first pass a review at WP:GAN. AIRcorn (talk) 00:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

GAN for M-36

You started Talk:M-36 (Michigan highway)/GA1 but you haven't done a review of the article. I'm just curious if you are still planning to review the article or not. If not, we can have someone else do the review. Imzadi 1979 → 06:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank u 4 reminding me about this . I will do it now ! -  Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 06:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know, you don't have to directly edit WP:GAN; the bot will update the status of nominations for you. I noticed that you've been putting articles as "on hold", but you can't do that until the article has been reviewed. When you start the review page, the bot will update the talk page template to put the article on review and update the listing. Once you've reviewed the article, you change that template to say "onhold" and the bot will update the listing. Imzadi 1979 → 07:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm just curious to know when you plan to review the article. The usual practice is to review the article soon after taking it from the queue. I see that you've been editing over the last two days since I queried you last. If you're no longer interested in reviewing the article, we can have someone else do it. Imzadi 1979 → 13:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok , fyn , I will surely review today . Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 13:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

There is a discussion at WT:GAN#Clarification on expectations concerning you and this situation. Please feel free to contribute to it. Imzadi 1979 → 02:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last call. Please let me know if you plan on starting this review. If you're too busy, we can have an admin delete the review page so that some other editor can sign up for the review. As it stands now, your name is listed on WP:GAN meaning no one else will review the article, but if you can't or won't do the review, it will never get done. Most reviews are completed within a day of the time that the reviewer signs up for the review, yet I've waited over a week now. I've also had two other articles reviewed and promoted in the mean time. Imzadi 1979 → 03:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Look, I'm sorry for all of this, but I'm having someone delete the review page you started. I feel that I've been incredibly patient waiting for a review. Most reviewers post their comments within a day of taking up an article from the queue. I had to query you almost a week after you took up the article from the queue, and a few times since then. I still don't have my article reviewed by you, and so I'm going to return it to the queue so someone else can review it. In the time I've waited, I've had two other articles reviewed and promoted to GAs. Thank you for your interest, and I'm sorry this didn't work out. Imzadi 1979 → 22:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Hindi?

Why in the world are you adding Hindi to the language on infobox of obviously non-Hindi films? BollyJeff || talk 13:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your appreciation. Thanks for your invitation. I'm not familiar with the new appearance of chronology on facebook and didn't see any "add as friend" button. May you add me first. My address: [email protected]. See you. M. Adiputra (talk) 07:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, Fyn, I have sent you a request . Talk 2 you there later. Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 07:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Kunwar Amar, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.

We should never write statements regarding ethnicity, religion etc unless the article subject has self-identified. Sitush (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Its not Controvesial . His Title of Kunwar with the Surname Singh describes him as Rajput . Thanxx - Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 14:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

That is not good enough, sorry. For example, I know people called Nair and Iyer who have not the slightest chance of being related to the Nair or Iyer communities. Equally, I could change my name to Kunwar Amar tomorrow - at the trivial cost of £35 - and still would not be a Rajput. The requirement for self-identification of ethnicity, religion and similar highly personal matters is a well-established principle and if you want to proceed then you will need to seek consensus at WP:BLPN. - Sitush (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I know ur Concern, but almost 90 % people with both of these Title are identified as Rajput . - Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 14:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Your statement merely justifies the policy: would you have us label the other 10% as something which they are not? Which is the greater evil: saying nothing or saying something that is incorrect? - Sitush (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Sunhak

Look at this book People of India Himachal Pradesh Volume XXIV by B.R Sharma and A.B Sankhyan Manohar 1996 pages 590 to 593 published by the Anthropological Survey of India, where there is an article on this caste.

--WALTHAM2 (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Where i can download the book to read ? Is the book could be found online ? Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 21:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure if the Himachal Pradesh copy is available online. Google books have the Gujarat and Rajasthan. I suggest try a library.--WALTHAM2 (talk) 22:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)