User talk:Rabbanituhin

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Rabbanituhin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Top Jim (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Thank you, Top Jim. I will follow your instructions!----User:Rabbanituhin

Nomination of Frantic Amber for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Frantic Amber, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frantic Amber until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:33, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ajna Offensive

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Ajna Offensive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Coolug (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Ajna Offensive

Hello! Your submission of The Ajna Offensive at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Ajna Offensive

Gatoclass (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Helena Waldmann

Hi. Thank you for your contribution of Helena Waldmann. I have made some quick improvements for you (compare the diffs to see the details) but it would be good if you could follow the links in the welcome message above, particularly those that concern WP:MOS and WP:CITE and do the rest. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 04:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Metal Maze

The article Metal Maze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC; can't find any reliable sources at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 00:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Eccentric Pendulum for deletion

The article Eccentric Pendulum is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eccentric Pendulum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 01:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mortuary Drape

The article Mortuary Drape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. No reliable sources at all. Typical of the references is a page which says "Create your own website for your band,add your songs and photos" at the top of it. Tagged for notability since November 2010, and no improvement in that time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cadaveric Crematorium

The article Cadaveric Crematorium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. The references include the band's own site, brief listings, announcement of a gig, another Wikipedia article (which is completely unsourced), etc. The article makes repeated reference to more notable bands which this band has performed with in a support role - pretty well a guaranteed indicator of a lack of notability in their own right. Tagged for notability since November 2010, and no significant change since then.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)