User talk:Qwerty Binary/archive7

Panic at the Disco

Thanks for the head's up. I saw that you're already created the new category. I've created a category redirect from Category:Panic! at the Disco albums and edited the album articles accordingly. -- Mattbrundage (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Barefoot to Jerusalem

I created the page because I was working on the red link project (i.e. getting rid of red links) I got my material from the Nietzchka Keene page. What did you mean by changing user and ip? Tom (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My Relations to USANA

Hello Qwerty. Thank you for the tip on signing my name (I sometimes forget when I'm in a rush). The answer to your question is, no. I am in no way related to USANA either directly (Through their HQ) or by being a distributor nor have I ever been. I believe there are those who post in the article who are, but I'm totally independent. I sort of stumbled upon USANA awhile ago when some people asked if I would be interested. I listened to their "pitch" and then began to do my own research. The Wikipedia article on them was disabled due to vandalism so I had to look elsewhere. From poking around I realized that the people who tried to recruit me were mis-informed on a number of issues which is why I decided I would try my hand at monitoring the USANA page on Wikipedia when I noticed it was no longer disabled. I try to be as neutral as possible.

Do you find I lean to much to one side? There are further issues with the article I would like to address, but I'm not sure if I'd be nit-picking. For instance, the Nutrisearch Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements which gave USANA a 5-Star rating is no peer-reviewed and from what I've read some of their independant testers/evaluators are/were affiliated with USANA. Would this count as biased information? If you feel I'm taking to much of a POV stance please let me know. I try to be fairly well read on this topic, so if you have any questions about what I or others have posted I'll try to answer them. Jean314 (talk) 23:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hello Qwerty Binary, I noticed you revert vandalism occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account rollback rights to help you revert vandalism more easily? Acalamari 16:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Rollback granted. :) I came across you because my talk page was linked to from your user page. After finding you, I decided to review some of your edits, and decided that you would be a good person to grant rollback to. For additional information and practice on rollback, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 15:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Good luck. Acalamari 15:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hurrah! A Year of Ta-Dah.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hurrah! A Year of Ta-Dah.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PatD - Build God, Then We'll Talk.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PatD - Build God, Then We'll Talk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Sandboxed article

Hi there! I've had to delete your sandboxed article because the GFDL attribution (history) was broken when you transferred it to your userspace. However, you hadn't made any edits to it, so nothing was lost :). Seraphim♥Whipp 11:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Terrorist Handbook

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Terrorist Handbook, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)