User talk:Qurtuva

Islamic honorifics[edit]

Please read and follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles - we do NOT use PBUH, SAWW, or any other honorific or symbol - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Caliphs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please stop adding these honorific symbols as explained above - Arjayay (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you can remove it without removing while texts to actual sources on the Fatimids and Hugh Kennedy instead of undoing everything, I undid the edit where someone reinserted sourceless claims

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Caliphs, you may be blocked from editing.
It was up to you not to re-add it, not expect someone else to remove it, as you clearly knew how to - Arjayay (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Qurtuva, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Qurtuva! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

January 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samina Ali . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 03:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nikah mut'ah; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —Paleo Neonate – 15:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]