User talk:PurpleHeartEditor/Archives/

Status indicator

You'll find the information you're looking for at User_talk:Thomas888b/Archive_1#Status_indicator. Let me know if you need further assistance! Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonder Woman-75.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman-75.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, PurpleHeartEditor. You have new messages at Thomas888b's talk page.
Message added 13:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Thomas888b (Say Hi) 13:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

R'lyeh

You are claiming issue with unsourced material, yet your significant edits seems to be removing a lot of material with sources. I have reverted the changes, as the amount of text shifted makes it pretty hard to be precise on what you have and have not removed. If you would kindly tag any areas with which you have problems with a "citation" or similar tag, as well as bring matters to the talk page for discussion. Removing large portions of the article without discussion for a third time would be rather bad form. Thanks. Human.v2.0 (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Kraken

Thanks to you as well! Glad we got that cleared up about the cleaning up of the article. Now that things have settled down quite a bit, I think it's rather clear that what you did was very good for the article. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, PurpleHeartEditor/Archives. You have new messages at Talk:Kraken/Archive 1#Lots of content removed...twice?.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.

Question

I've notice that on your talk page that you have "archives". May I ask you how do you create them, because I would want such a feature to organize my user talk. (Rendőrség - Magyar (talk) 08:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC))

Thank you very much Thebladesofchaos. Thank you. (Rendőrség - Magyar (talk) 09:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC))

ANI

Thebladesofchaos, please see the discussion at WP:ANI#Release the kraken!. Thanks, Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not saying the name change had anything to do with this, just pointing that out as it's difficult to follow the history of the scenario without that information. I hope you realize that regardless of whether there were tiny compromises here and there, you both are still edit warring (and the article size in the history log definitely shows it). Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

What he did was wrong, yes, but it takes two to edit war. Note that the things you accuse him of doing you've done as well. You're both on eggshells now. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Kraken edits

Greetings. I was wondering why you added the {{Underconstruction}} tag to the article for Kraken (roller coaster). It usually helps to provide an edit summary explaining why you believe such a tag is necessary. Yes, I agree that the article is relatively short and sparse on information, but I don't believe any suggestions have been made that it should be deleted, which would be one potential reason for adding that tag. I have removed it for now, but if you feel it's necessary, please leave a rationale on the article's talk page at the same time you re-post the tag. Thanks for your support of this article, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 14:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

The Call of Cthulhu

I see you've been working away steadily on that article for a bit—I've got a few books sitting about the house which might be of use to you. A few of ST Joshi's annotated collections, and I might have seen the story referenced in some of the textbooks I used at uni. If you want I can dig the stuff out and look up anything you want cited or feel might be missing. GRAPPLE X 02:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

User_talk:Fastily#Question

You've been mentioned here, and not in a good way. You comments on this matter would be appreciated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

H. P. Lovecraft template discussion

I have responded to your recent post on my talk page at the H. P. Lovecraft template talk page in order to keep the ongoing discussion all in one place. Please reply to my post there, if you so desire. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 21:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)