User talk:Przyjmenski

Welcome!

Hello, Przyjmenski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lra drama 11:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeful links

Hi. I appreciate your effort to add links, but some discretion should be used. Human names that are not likely to have associated Wikipedia articles in the near future should not be linked. For this reason, I don't think there is any need to link the names "Strack" and "Stembereger". Neither link will go anywhere useful. If an author actually has a Wikipedia article already devoted to him or her (or if you are planning on imminently creating one), then it's a different story, of course. Thanks. Happy editing. —Dfass 19:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avigdor (disambiguation)

The article Avigdor (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS, direct hatnote more helpful to the reader in these circumstances

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 10:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bibl. Jud. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bibl. Jud.. Since you had some involvement with the Bibl. Jud. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]