User talk:Politics2005

February 2015

Hello, I'm George8211. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Darrell Brock Jr. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —George8211 / T 22:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Darrell Brock Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. I know one of the references is a dead link, but the other is reliable so there's no reason to remove this content. If you wish to take matters further, please discuss rather than undo. Thank you. —George8211 / T 22:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Darrell Brock Jr., you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Thelimiter (talk) 23:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

@Thelimiter: can you take a look at the edit summaries and sort it out? I have to go to bed. —George8211 / T 23:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Darrell Brock Jr. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)