Good work, I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to figure out how to get that on the map and now I find you've beaten me to it. Bah/hoorah. Yomanganitalk 17:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It looks a bit strange on a laptop that I checked it on. I've screen captured the OK-looking version which we could use instead. File:Haiti earthquake map.pngYomanganitalk 18:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Mama Can't Buy You Love.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Mama Can't Buy You Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:In My Little Corner Of The World.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:In My Little Corner Of The World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Hello Pichpich, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Up in the World, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→BWilkins←track) 22:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for your comment on the Nobel Prize FA. I have responded to your comment and hope it now is to your satisfaction. Cheers, Esuzu(talk • contribs) 14:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded again. Please take a look. Esuzu(talk • contribs) 14:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Why are you using your wikignome account to debate Admin policy? You have a regular account, right?Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info. If you've pretty much ditched your admin account, then I guess there's no problem. I was just slightly concerned that you might be someone I know who didn't want me to know that I know. If that's not the case, then never mind. Thx.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I don't really see what anyone would have to gain by deliberately making false statements. Nor do I understand why it is necessary to make personal attacks, I prefer a happy working climate here. --Kudpung (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Today, the YMCA organization in the United States has officially changed its branding to "the Y" and a The Y (disambiguation) page has been created because now "the Y" prevalent use is for the YMCA's official branding. Check out the news release at [1]Steelbeard1 (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, About my page, T.U.F.F. Puppy, Someone else has edited it to give it more detail. And I helped out whoever re-edited it on the page List of T.U.F.F. Puppy characters.
Can you please forgive me and delete the deletion notice?
I'm calling in about a CSD tag which you just removed from On-demand scan article. Your edit summary makes me think you've probably meant to remove a bogus AFD tag (not CSD) from an article which was open at the same time in your web browser. Correct me if I am wrong, but when a user puts a CSD tag on a page, that page is an official candidate or nominee for speedy deletion, right? An administrator must attend to the nomination, right?
Of course, if I am wrong in any of what I said above, just notify me.
By the way, in case I am right, you'd better rush to that page with bogus AFD notice. Fleet Command (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? So, you mean you wanted to oppose this CSD? If I knew that I wouldn't have undone it! Sorry about that undoing man; it didn't sound like that to me. So, next time would you please write "I oppose this CSD"? See you around. Fleet Command (talk) 18:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to have a quick blurb about the company, not only a redirect. Wtferguson (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
If a redirect makes more sense, then I suppose that will work. I realize they are in essence the same, but I wanted to have that blurb because the company technically no longer exists. Then it is internally linked to the other page. Wtferguson (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you edit Jean-Marc Vacheron, CAN'T you see the under construction tag ?!! -- Prunk (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, stop editing the article, until I finish it and learn about under construction tag and respect it ! I had to re-do my entries several time, becouse you keep jumping in ! -- Prunk (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome to edit the article appropriatelly, but please wait for another hour, until I finish the writing and remove the under construction tag. Thank you ! -- Prunk (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on the Categorized Patrol/Task Force for a Signpost article to be published next month. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused by your re-addition of categories such as Category:Nycteribiidae to articles where I had removed them. I cannot see that having a category for two articles is in any way helpful (see WP:CAT for a brief discussion of the purpose of categories). It's not even as if Category:Flies was so large as to be unwieldy. If your intention is that all fly articles should be in a family category, for the sake of symmetry, let me assure you that that isn't necessary. It is perfectly acceptable to have a few articles from small families floating in the main category. --Stemonitis (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This page was not created as a "test". It was created out of a legitimate desire to create a category page. True, I did not review the spelling as closely as I should have, but it was an unintentional misspelling.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pichpich. I noticed that you had made edits to the article on the French Actress Madeleine Ozeray. I am looking for people who are interested in creating quality articles on the plays of Jean Giraudoux and related subjects. Giraudoux is not a big enough subject to be a WikiProject; but all of 20th century French drama certainly would be. For a complete outline of my ideas on the subject, see my personal page at the link below. If you are interested, drop me a note on that same personal page.
Hello Pichpich, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around.
For your support vote in my rfa. This is a personal thank you note Pichpich. Appreciate it. Wifione ....... Leave a message 08:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Pichpich. You have moved the page "France national racquetball team" to "French national racquetball team". If you observe the Category:National sports teams of France, you will see that all french national teams have the name "France national ... team". I think you should undo your edit. --Puigsacalm (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting the clean athletics event articles after the copyright bot edits. There are literally hundreds of these and I'm glad I'm not the only one working on it! SFB 22:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Please remember to check articles as patrolled when you have tagged them. It avoid duplication of effort, especially in times like these where there is a massive backlog. Cheers. --Kudpung (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After I saw the tag which you had added to Category:Occupational surnames, I populated the category with occupational surname articles. At first, I added articles on surnames that I remembered, and then I added surname articles that I found in Category:Surnames.
If an article said that a surname was an occupational surname, then the decision to add the article to the category was straightforward. Otherwise, if I found a corresponding definition in Wiktionary, then I included a link to the definition in my edit summary. (I missed wikt:panettiere, Italian for "baker", for Panettiere.) There were many surnames (not only English ones) which I omitted because their articles did not explicitly state that they were occupational surnames, although they probably are. Some examples are Painter and Dancer (disambiguation).
(I am adding this talk page to my watchlist, and I will watch here for a reply or replies.)
—Wavelength (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great job! This is way beyond what I expected when I placed that tag so thanks a lot. Pichpich (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are very welcome.—Wavelength (talk) 22:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
