User talk:Peyton Was My Cat 87
Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]
Hi. I'm Eman235 and I'd like to thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia.
Here's some links you might find useful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- The Manual of Style (simplified version)
- A cheatsheet of Wikimarkup
- A glossary of Wikipedia jargon
- Where to ask questions: the Teahouse is a good place for this, as is the Help desk; for a factual Q&A forum, see the Reference desk. Other pages can be found here.
- Writing an article? See Your first article and Article development. Requested articles lists many pages in need of creation.
Things everyone should know:
- Always sign your posts with four tildes —
~~~~ - Remember to keep your cool
- Never violate copyrights
- And always assume good faith (because not every unconstructive edit is vandalism).
When it boils down to it, editing Wikipedia is a fairly simple thing to do; you're encouraged to be bold when updating pages. Anyway, Peyton Was My Cat 87, good luck! Eman235/talk 03:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Peyton Was My Cat 87. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Sarah Lacina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Sarah Lacina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 12:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Shirin Oskooi for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shirin Oskooi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirin Oskooi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Kelly Goldsmith for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Goldsmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Goldsmith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
"Lee Masters" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Lee Masters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 17 § Lee Masters until a consensus is reached. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)