User talk:PerspicazHistorian

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello PerspicazHistorian, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Lingayat Vani (caste) to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 00:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Veerashaiva

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Veerashaiva. RI ^talk 13:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Veerashaiva and Lingayatism is about same topic stop removing redirect,

If you want to add about Panchacharyas you can add it in Panchacharyas RI ^talk 13:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stop pushing Hindutva ideology RI ^talk 15:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No one is pushing Hindutva Ideology. The topic is controversial and everyone is free to discuss on it. It exists since 2004, No need to remove whole article. Every opinion Matters, stop vandalizing the article and abide by the rules of Wikipedia. Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 08:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You copied lot of content from other lingayat related articles and added it to Linagayt Vani, you didn't give attribution to original authors ,Wikipedia:ATTREQ, also most of this content no where related to Lingayat vani , it actually belongs to other subcastes of Lingayatism, your pushing Hindutva agenda, Wikipedia:NPOV RI ^talk 15:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I respect Your opinion, but do not vandalize any article by deleting the whole content. Discussion forums are there for a reason. You are engaging in vandalism, {{uw-vandalism2}}. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 08:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the page provides brief description about panchacharyas, not the whole topic discussed here. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 08:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lingayatism article already mention brief description about Panchacharyas.

The Veerashaiva article is full about Panchacharyas only, so stop vandalism blame , RI ^talk 08:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no it also involves guru lineage,peethas and philosophy too. Lingayat and Veershaiva both are still under controversy, if you say they are the same topic. see: https://www.oneindia.com/india/how-are-veerashaivas-and-lingayats-different-2510776.html https://www.wionews.com/india-news/difference-between-veerashaivas-and-lingayats-36608 https://theprint.in/theprint-essential/who-are-lingayats-veerashaivas-and-why-they-matter-in-karnataka-polls/43421/. @Ekdalian I am reverting the edits. I know you have done a good research on the topic and since you are a more professional editor on Wikipedia, I hope you understand. Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Veerashaiva. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 08:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page is a controversial topic. Deleting the whole page makes no sense. Rather than deleting the whole page from Wikipedia, its better to try reaching an consensus. But the other user keep reverting the edits. Thanks for your advice, applying for page protection. Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 08:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lingayatism#Lingayatism read second paragraph of that section, Panchacharyas are mentioned, [1] britanica also mention Lingayat also known as Veerashaiva, the article Lingayatism also mentions the same , the redirect is correct,

You want to prove Mythological Panchacharyas are founders of Veerashaiva, that's why your removing redirect, RI ^talk 08:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am already mentioned in talk page of Lingayat Vani why I given redirect, but your not ready to discussion, your blaming other editors as vandals . RI ^talk 09:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that's not a valid point. Most of the content is well researched and cited. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 09:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Despite of warning your continuing your POV RI ^talk 09:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) The article addresses all the opinions.

2) The intro itself proves how liberal the article is. Nothing promotes the hindutva ideology. What do you wanna say, whole article is hindutva? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 09:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not about Lingayat Vani, your copied it from other Lingayat related articles isn't, RI ^talk 09:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lingayat Vani are separately addressed in the article. You can't say whole article has been copy pasted. Its a work of research and makes Wikipedia a more useful alliance of information gathered from various sources. We can discuss it in the talk page, create a discussion but do not abruptly delete the whole article. If that's not vandalism, what else should i call it? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 09:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Bhimashankaralinga Shivacharya, you may be blocked from editing. In this edit summary from today, your edit summary was "made grammatical corrections, and added citations", when all you really did was remove a template that belonged there. Did you really think nobody would notice? Wikishovel (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lingayat Vani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lingayat Vani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingayat Vani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Ratnahastin (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]