User talk:Pauly04

Welcome!

Hello, Pauly04, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 16:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russia and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Russia and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Please check out if Wikinews is the place where you wanted to contribute! Tikiwont 16:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power[edit]

Hi. I've made a minor change to your recent edit, but the sense is the same: WP:CITE suggests using the original source, rather than an "improper" intermediate source, when you can. Some of the original wording looked a bit like a "cut and paste" and in consequence the style was a bit journalistic, rather than encyclopedic. I hope that's all OK! --Old Moonraker 22:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civilian casualties of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)[edit]

I know it isn't obvious in the main title of the article but this article is about Coalition civilian victims in Afghanistan, those killed by Foreign Troops. The original title stated "United States" in the title but other foreign troops, Canadians etc, began their own contributions to killing civilian Afghans.

If you want to begin a tally of Afghan Civilians killed in all actions in the war, in suicide bombings etc, it would be a welcome task to undertake, but it would have to be under a different article I think, or all previous Afghan agains Afghan clashes that resulted in Afghan civilian deaths would have to be added to this article.

I've also edited a bit your contribution to the March 4th incident, but I think the content is the same. It just looked like there had been a separate incident on March 14 (the date of the NY Times Article" the way you wrote it. I hope its ok with you

Regards, Hudicourt 14:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwe[edit]

I removed your addition to Zimbabwe as I believe it belongs in the current events page, or at current events/Africa. --Ezeu 21:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John McCain[edit]

Hi, I reverted your edits to John McCain because it resulted in the information being doubled. Enigma ^msg! 20:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Turkey[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Turkey. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to tropical cyclone[edit]

I removed your mentioning of a cyclone affecting Germany. That was not a tropical cyclone, and including it in the tropical cyclone page is false. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pauly![edit]

Thanks for your contributions. Please use acute accents when needed when writing Spaniard names, as in Hugo Chávez. Regards. --Damifb (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Air Transat Incident[edit]

These passenger related incidents occur several times a year to all airlines. Are you certain it is relevant and deserves mention in an airline's history? Will this incident be relevant in 10 years? They probably had dozens of such incidents over their 20 years existence. Hudicourt (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

China population[edit]

Alot of the Chinese Parents have more than 1 child, the laws and regulations don't really matter much to them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwilso (talk • contribs) 08:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Scarlett Keeling case[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Scarlett Keeling case. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 21:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

transwiki Scarlett Keeling case[edit]

There has been a proposal to move Scarlett Keeling case to wikinews, a wikimedia site devoted to news. For legal reasons your permission is required for the move since the move would involve a change of copyright license (from wikipedia's GNU Free Documentation License to wikinews' Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License). This will end the deletion discussion and allow work to continue on the article there. Please respond at Talk:Scarlett Keeling case. Jon513 (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy material directly from news websites.[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

The material you added to Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008 in this edit contained several sentences copied directly from this CNN story. If any of your other contributions contain directly copied sentences, please reword them to avoid violating the news source's copyright. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While your efforts are appreciated, I must echo Josiah above in stressing that it is very important that you not copy and paste material directly from other websites. Everyking (talk) 08:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing with regard to the Julie Jensen Case. DavidOaks (talk) 03:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The March 3 2008 shooting of Memphis (Tennessee)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The March 3 2008 shooting of Memphis (Tennessee), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The March 3 2008 shooting of Memphis (Tennessee). Mr.Z-man 00:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Aim murder[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Karen Aim murder, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? gadfium 08:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klever Sailema case[edit]

The article Klever Sailema case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (events) per WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plutonium27 (talk) 05:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Aim murder for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Aim murder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Aim murder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ducknish (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vadim Tikhonov case[edit]

The article Vadim Tikhonov case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Doesn't have Russian version.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Denise "Dee Dee" Walker case for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Denise "Dee Dee" Walker case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Denise "Dee Dee" Walker case until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 15:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Osborne (sport shooter) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Osborne (sport shooter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Osborne (sport shooter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer T·C 17:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]