Jump to content

User talk:Paradise Chronicle/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi you fighting against socks

[edit]

in Van, Turkey you fighting against possible socks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Omar_Nasuhi_Bilmen&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%96mer_Nasuhi_Bilmen&action=history both share same arguments in talk + both created same page. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC) @Yerevantsi:[reply]

[[1]] he do here POV Shadow4dark (talk) 13:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beth kustan

[edit]

Why did you change it, it’s incorrect to say they are Assyrians. They are arameans and they speek Aramaic /Syriac Suryoyutho (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply Suryoyutho (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There has been an other editor changing Assyrians into Arameans, also without adding a source. If you add a source to it, I won't revert it anymore.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you I will add sources as fast as i can Suryoyutho (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are books as sources enough? Suryoyutho (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Paradise Chronicle/Archive 3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Kurdish culture

[edit]

We cannot put wrong information even if you type (citation needed):

It is nota country and they have no real political power. That the Kurds don't have a country is quite easy to proof.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are not talking about a state but a political entity, although there is also Rojava, but it is not recognized. On the contrary, Iraqi Kurdistan is one of the regions that has more political and autonomous power. Also, no information is true for the largest people who do not have a state. AviarL (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am an editor for the Arabic Wikipedia, and I checked the information, it was taken from a talk show called “Al-Mayadeen”, and the information was removed from the Arabic Wikipedia. AviarL (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, do you want to remove something because it is unsourced or because it has nothing to do with the topic? I have sourced the phrase now and removed it from the lead as the article is about Kurdish culture and not Kurdish entities or countries.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Adi Ibn Musafir was a Muslim

[edit]

I'm backing up with english Sources right now , however the Arabic script websites are actually the online book of Imam adDhabai a famous classical medieval author and authentic source , I'm adding it with other English sources too , it's a matter of fact Sheikh Adi was a Muslim mystic scholar — Preceding unsigned comment added by AleviQizilbash (talk • contribs) 22:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be interested in it. And it is difficult to believe he was known for Islam or Muslim. And if it is a well known classical scholar he should have a an English book as well. As far as I have seen the scholar is from 1300 something, which makes it quite interesting.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Whether Yezidis like the fact that he was Muslim or not doesn't matter , because Muslims venerate him too as a holy saint , your Jesus parable doesn't make any sense , because Jews don't acknowledge Jesus as a Prophet or a holy saint or as a Jewish scholar , for them he was a heretic maniac while Sheikh Adi for Muslims was a saint and I've provided first hand original sources in Arabic . also English sources confirm this fact too , no where in any English article said that he was just " once a sufi " you don't even read the sources or you are trying to read it with your own fake glasses to appease a certain group while throwing away all academic standards of neutrality , I didn't remove the quote of how he was a Yazidi sheikh too because I'm neutral and using academic standards but you are the one who keep deleting the fact that he was a Muslim , this is a cheap miserable way to hide facts in order to appease some groups . I demand that you revert my Links and sources back . Stop your biased behavior , Stop your Islamophobia . — Preceding unsigned comment added by AleviQizilbash (talk • contribs) 07:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise, it looks like someone is running into trouble and denying it again. Should we notify Black Kite? - AppleBsTime (talk) 12:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let's leave it to Wbiases. I'll notify Wbiases about my differences with him, and then Wbiases can take action if they see it as a appropriate. Then could join in and support him.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wbiases is not even as experienced an editor as I am, and far less than you are. I recommend that you escalate. If you don't, I would... but seeing that you have 5x more edits than I do, I think you hold more authority. - AppleBsTime (talk) 17:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes this sounds like a conspiracy against me that should be reported ,Well done , Thank you for your cooperation AleviQizilbash (talk) 17:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not canvassing for input, but if you are so moved: I opened a WP:AN/I about the user AleviQizilbash. - AppleBsTime (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Any ideas?

[edit]

The person named in WP:AN3#User:AleviQizilbash reported by User:Thhings6sz (Result: ) has posted on your talk previously. Does this mean you have any idea what that dispute could be about? Let me know. If there was any way to negotiate this dispute, it might be possible to close it without blocks. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Three users with the same method and same mentality among them User Things6sz appeared in the same time and started to vandalize the article of Begin Sadat Center for Strategic Studies , deleting third party sources and citations of existing information then added tons of promotional primary sources , then engaged in edtiing warring and accused me of vandalism and warring ! here is the revision history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Begin%E2%80%93Sadat_Center_for_Strategic_Studies&action=history

However later I found out that User:Paradise Chronicle and User User:AppleBsTime turned out to be planning a conspiracy against me on Begin Sadat Center article , they pre planned an escalated dispute to report me and grant me a block , here is the evidence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paradise_Chronicle#Sheikh_Adi_Ibn_Musafir_was_a_Muslim and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wbiases , that's why you are here now to block me , this is their pre planned conspiracy , you can verify it yourself , I believe that they need to be blocked and banned for life along with their IP ranges over their hateful and abusive behavior along with the three other users whom I highly suspect that they are actually the same person , their pages are :User Wbiases , User I69i197496 and User Thhings6sz along with User AppleBsTime and User Paradise Chronicle , Thank You so muchAleviQizilbash (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted previously Yes in 13 September and the problem was resolved by another Admin named User:Black Kite , I never talked to Paradise Chronicle or AppleBsTime since then , even I thanked Paradise for an editing on Begin Sadat Center today , then to my shock I entered her page today to find the preplanned conspiracy against meAleviQizilbash (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no conspiracy. There is no plan. What we have is a new editor exploring the boundaries of the "deranged Wikipedia editor" role that we occasionally see. We probably have a textbook case of Wikipedia:BOOMERANG about to unveil itself. - AppleBsTime (talk) 21:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
EdJohnston Alevi... didn't take part at the discussions at the talk page in question until today and I told the one who was active at the talk page that I and one more had trouble with him as well and I[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wbiases&diff=prev&oldid=981483363&diffmode=source assured him of my support], if he'd ask for a solution in the dispute or has decided to report him. Alevi... has taken part in the talk page discussion today and let's see. The page has been partially protected since 2 October.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the dispute has found an temporary solution without me.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:ECP protection certainly takes care of the problem for now. If User:AleviQizilbash continues to talk that way he may have a short career on Wikipedia. I'd suggest he read WP:Aspersions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
EdJohnstonthe dispute is over and came to end , I've participated in the talk page , Thank YouAleviQizilbash (talk) 05:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish irredentism

[edit]

I guess you don't know the meaning of irredentism: Irredentism is a political and popular movement that claims, reclaims (usually on behalf of the corresponding nation), and seeks to occupy territory that the movement's members consider to be a "lost" (or "unredeemed") territory, based on history or even legend., I hope it explained. Beshogur (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yeah, this is what it is. The four parts of Kurdistan are not a popular or political movement as such. Find a political party that wants to create an Iraqi, Iranian, Syrian or Turkish Kurdistan. Turkish irredentism would also not fit to Iraqi Kurdistan or Mosul, but it would fit to the article about Misak I Milli. The KDP in Iraq wanted to create a Kurdistan in Iraq. The article about the Referendum of independence of the KRG and beyond is maybe also an article the category fits to.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Turkish Kurdistan" is not Turkish irredentism, but Mosul is, I agree. But Turkish Kurdistan is clearly Kurdish irredentism, considering Kurds didn't gained their independence, and they still claim lot of territories outside their control in Iraq, it's still irredentism. I hope you understand. There are similar categories for other nations. Beshogur (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Noticeboard

[edit]

Hi,

GPinkerton's citation of books + my summary was what I was looking for in the first place when I criticized how you brought it to NPOV/N. That allows an editor to quickly view what has happened so far in the discussion and why you believe you're point of view is correct; criticizing the others' point of view at the start isn't helpful and causes more problems to people viewing and attempting to access the original problem.

Side note: The article in its present form is full of NPOV violations; setting up an RfC to clear it up will not only allow for clarification, but will also bring others to the article who are by and large neutral to the original problem. Based on the number of editors mediation is not helpful; I hadn't seen the full scope of the problem when I recommended it.

Thanks, SixulaTalk 22:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. We have a good and serious editor in the article which is Applodion. An other good editor in Konli17. (he is really good in adding a flow to an article). We all struggle with arguments and sources but Amr Ibn just has something against the Kurdish population in Syria and sees the Kurdish liberators from ISIS as occupiers. This is from a talk in January 2019. Also if the Kurds liberate areas of Jihadist control they are seen as occupiers by him, see here and here in talks of 2017. There would be many more. I don't get it why he is so well respected amongst admins. Anyway, we struggle on. Admins won't help, nor did noticeboards until today thanks to GPinkerton. We have had veeeery long discussions with Amr Ibn during which he managed to get others blocked for 3RR, while the blocked one hasn't broken any rule and was reverting less than Amr Ibn reverted.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I'm gonna step away from this debate because it seems more heated then I'd like. One thing that does worry me is how much page views have spiked in recent days; I don't know if there is some attempt at canvassing right now. Also, if you want to view [2] which is presently a thing presently about عمرو بن كلثوم and on this topic. Thanks, SixulaTalk 12:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Paradise Chronicle, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have created a considerable number of biographies, including quite a few about women. Your interest in covering Turks and Kurds is appreciated. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I've read the ten simple rules. I hope I'll edit better with them in the future. Looking forward to contribute to women in red.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you for your patience again.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Genocide

[edit]

Hello, the reason for my revert was not to waste 100k+ sourced articles. Please, I would appreciate it if you ask one by one instead of deleting the whole article.You are right about the Armenian genocide. Also prejudice is not good I already adjusted it & the events of genocide were not even mentioned in the Armenia section of the article until 1910-1980 I'll be glad if you look again... Thanks & best regards Cengiz.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 11:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 00:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red!

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

You've got mail!

[edit]
Hello, Paradise Chronicle. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

(t · c) buidhe 23:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to help edit the article on Anti-Azerbaijani sentiment?

[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you'd like to help edit the article on Anti-Azerbaijani sentiment with me?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anti-Azerbaijani_sentiment — Preceding unsigned comment added by CessnaMan1989 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like to change? Not really interested, so far.

Republican Villagers Nation Party

[edit]
Hello, Paradise Chronicle. You have new messages at Talk:Republican Villagers Nation Party.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Template:Anti-Turkism

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Anti-Turkism, you may be blocked from editing.

Note refrain from edits like this and this. You've engaged in disruptive editing as removing content without even achieve any kind of a consensus is not tolerated here. Even if you've achieved consensus, removing content would still be violating the guidelines. The right way is to request for deletion. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 21:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have also requested deletion as you could see if checking the edit history.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Picasso referendum of Basel at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this service is really helpful. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dolmen de Soto

[edit]

On 7 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dolmen de Soto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Dolmen de Soto is one of about 1,650 neolithic burial sites in Andalusia, and assumed to have been built between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dolmen de Soto. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dolmen de Soto), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Trial of Abdullah Öcalan

[edit]

On 13 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trial of Abdullah Öcalan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Turkey built a courtroom on the island of İmralı for the 1999 trial of Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trial of Abdullah Öcalan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Trial of Abdullah Öcalan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prison

[edit]

I nominated an article that you started for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/İmralı prison. SL93 (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this DYK! I'm learning a lot of what I didn't know about the DYK process already. :) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for İmralı prison

[edit]

On 24 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article İmralı prison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after he escaped from the high-security İmralı prison, Billy Hayes wrote a book about the escape that was later adapted into a film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/İmralı prison. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, İmralı prison), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great news

[edit]

Your created article İmralı prison received 12,449 views while on the main page as part of DYK. I listed it at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics. SL93 (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for the interesting hook! Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Suffrage Torch

[edit]

On 27 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Suffrage Torch, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Suffrage Torch was a symbol of illumination during the Suffragist campaigns in the states of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania in the summer of 1915 and the idea of Harriot Stanton Blatch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Suffrage Torch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Suffrage Torch), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ahmet Cevat Emre

[edit]

On 27 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ahmet Cevat Emre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ahmet Cevat Emre shared a household with Vâlâ Nureddin and Nâzım Hikmet in Batumi, with Emre responsible for cooking, Hikmet writing poetry and Nureddin giving Turkish language lessons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ahmet Cevat Emre. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ahmet Cevat Emre), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vâlâ Nureddin

[edit]

On 27 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vâlâ Nureddin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ahmet Cevat Emre shared a household with Vâlâ Nureddin and Nâzım Hikmet in Batumi, with Emre responsible for cooking, Hikmet writing poetry and Nureddin giving Turkish language lessons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ahmet Cevat Emre. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vâlâ Nureddin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elazığ Girls' Institute

[edit]

On 3 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elazığ Girls' Institute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Elazığ Girls' Institute was established in 1937 to assimilate "primitive" Kurdish girls by transforming them into "civilized" Turkish women? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elazığ Girls’ Institute. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elazığ Girls' Institute), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

[edit]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 16:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Iraqi Turkmen

[edit]

Hi Paradise Chronicle, sorry to bother you, but I saw that you put a notice about discretionary sanctions on the page of User:Shejsisijdwjdj. This user has been creating problems for about two weeks at the Iraqi Turkmen article. With some effort I could bring him to the talk page, but now he is starting again with disruptive editing. I'm no expert in discretionary sanctions, I'd like to know how you can invoke the intervention of an administrator because of his removal of parts of sentences that are strongly referenced and even part of the title. My only link to this article, which I find well done, is the translation of the article itself for Italian wikipedia, where I am also active. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the problem is solved now. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi Kurdistan

[edit]

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. In Talk:Iraqi Kurdistan, User:Anonymoosy13 has called you an "idiot". You may need to take some action. Dimadick (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's ok, they seem to be a new editor. I'll encourage them to edit somewhere else where they are able to. Thank you.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maria Karapetyan

[edit]

On 26 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Karapetyan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before she was elected to the Parliament of Armenia, Maria Karapetyan spray-painted political graffiti on the streets of Yerevan in support of Nikol Pashinyan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Karapetyan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Karapetyan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

[edit]

Hello Paradise Chronicle:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1300 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi Paradise Chronicle, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Knyaz Hasanov

[edit]

On 23 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Knyaz Hasanov, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kurdish-Armenian politician Knyaz Hasanov chaired the Armenian Parliament in 2017 and 2021? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Knyaz Hasanov. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Knyaz Hasanov), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paintings by Lotte Laserstein

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Paintings by Lotte Laserstein indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, I created the category on Wikipedia by mistake as I was loading up paintings of Lotte Laserstein on commons and didn't find a category for her paintings there. You can delete the category therefore with my consent for now.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 Women in Red

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK review

[edit]

Thanks for the kind DYK review! I knew if the article makes DYK that's likely to be the most it's ever read, so wanted readers to experience a thorough article with all the top sources in place. Blythwood (talk) 07:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assigment of "Mid" Importance

[edit]

Hello @Paradise Chronicle. Please avoid assigning "Mid" importance on articles for WikiProjects that you have not any experience with. Refering to your edit on Lorraine Schembri Orland Signed,Pichemist (Talk) 09:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate on that? She is a Judge at the European Court of Human Rights and of a let's admit rather small country of Malta. She is probably in one of the most prominent positions a Maltese can get.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Paradise Chronicle As a Maltese National speaking, she has been barely been mentioned on any of the news outlets. The full assessment criteria is in the WikiProject Assessment page. Signed,Pichemist (Talk) 13:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. I personally still believe a Mid is ok, even more since she is the first woman to represent Malta at the court, but this is only me. And thanks for the notice, will be more careful in the future. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dyk question

[edit]

Hey, PC! I'm looking at the version you reviewed, and I don't see anything unsourced? Every paragraph ends with a source? valereee (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is now just a defense on my own and not a critic on TLC to whom I am really grateful for they work at the DYKs thanks to which I learned a lot and try to live up to the standards they put on me. But TLC demanded additional sources for phrases in paragraphs at the Caslon Type Foundry DYK and this is how the article looked back then and the paragraphs were full of quality sources and also ended with a source. They are sure a potentially excellent reviewer and DYK editor (maybe clerk is better here) but if one demands such quality from other editors, some might expect they'd deliver alike and this they just didn't do at the Hathaway DYK. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And on a second note referring to multiple sources in the Kurdistan conflict. There the same editor who criticized you for having entered the editorial dispute didn't even want to accept FOUR sources for a Kurdish name of a locality. Here, here and Here they remove them, in the last diff also the name in the article and I am grateful that you were involved in ending this problem.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PC, the version she seems to have reviewed had two paragraphs that ended without citations, it looks like to me? I would have queried that, too. For DYK, at minimum each paragraph needs a citation at the end, which the Hathaway did. valereee (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The way I see it each of the paragraphs they queried on had a source at the end. Then several already approved DYKs in the staging area also don't have a source in each end of their paragraph's. Examples are Habitation and Logistics Outpost, Woodland garden or Cece Carlucci. Cece Carlucci has an exactly! unsourced and was created by a Sysop. Then another Sysop demanded that a phrase at the beginning of a paragraph was sourced, yes, at the beginning of a paragraph, not at the end. It's ok if there are different points of view, I'll just try to do at every nomination what the reviewer wants. But maybe working on the DYK rules would be good, so that for confusing discussions like this there is a faster solution.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, whatever. I think your accusation that they were somehow requiring more from other people than from themselves is incorrect. If there are articles that don't have a cite at the end of each para, mark those paras with a cn. If TLC passed them, bring that up. But that's not what you're discussing here? valereee (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On TLC I leave it to the readers to decide, the diffs are given. Thanks for the advice with the cn. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to your insistence I investigated what a paragraph actually is, (I thought I knew it anyway) and I noticed a block quote can also be seen as a paragraph and needs to be sourced independently. This was the case for the first paragraph. The second paragraph was sourced with 6 or 8 sources for 5 phrases with an additional source at the end of the paragraph. Arthur Hewitt Hathaway was sourced with one source for 9 separate phrases. This is now just a defense of myself, I see TLC as an avid DYK reviewer with a remarkable learning curve. I guess the solution of this will just be that I need to nominate a DYK also with only one source for nine separate phrases and then link to this discussion if questioned on the sourcing. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in friendship

[edit]
January songs
in friendship

Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics is on the Main page, DYK? - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in case of interest, yesterday's snow and today's music in memory of Jerome Kohl --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 began happily with vacation. I uploaded images but stopped at 22 January - click on songs. 30 January means 10 years of Precious. It's also the birthday of a friend, - I'm so happy I mentioned his DYK on his 90th birthday when he was still alive. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Apennine Colossus

[edit]

On 11 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Apennine Colossus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Francesco de' Medici enjoyed sitting inside the head of the Apennine Colossus (pictured) and fishing through its eyes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Appennine Colossus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Apennine Colossus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 33,232 views (2,769.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work!

Holy wow! Great article and 33k agree with me. Bruxton (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

[edit]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

[edit]

Greetings @ Paradise Chronicle

Requesting your visit to the article Islamic marriage contract and Draft:Circassian women and help expand the same if topic interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dalai Lama's escape from China

[edit]

On 2 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dalai Lama's escape from China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mao Zedong initially approved the Dalai Lama's escape into Indian exile, but later ordered that it be prevented? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dalai Lama's escape from China. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dalai Lama's escape from China), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC) [reply]

February songs
frozen

thank you! - my joy - more on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, congratulations on this one.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! - Valentine's Day edition, with spring flowers and plenty of music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
stand and sing Prayer for Ukraine --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I took the pic in 2009, and it was on the German MP yesterday, with the song from 1885, in English Prayer for Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Walter Corti

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Walter Corti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruxton (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I responded there. And if you can, subscribe to the Wikipedia library, it is really a great source for information and can give you a variety of sources for your articles. In the present article about Walter Corti and the Pestalozzi Children's Village I was sort of really feeling the spirit of creating a beautiful space for the refugees to come..., really welcoming refugees. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paradise_Chronicle/Archive_3&oldid=1110397641"