User talk:PamelaBMX

Welcome!

Hello, PamelaBMX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! kelapstick (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Warwak

Your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Warwak is not considered a valid rationale in a deletion discussion (at least not here). You should take a look at WP:AFD for information about the Articles for Deletion process, and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, for arguments that generally don't carry much weight. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I see now how silly my vote was, I did not understand how things work. have looked at other AFD's and I see now it must be policy based argued and not just vote. Thanks for letting me know... Was the welcome bit above here from you? it seems not to have been signed how do I know who did it?PamelaBMX (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the welcome was from me, I forgot to sign, haven't added a welcome manually in a while...d'oh! Let me know if you have any other questions. kelapstick (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PamelaBMX. You have new messages at Kelapstick's talk page.
Message added 16:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

If you reply on my talk page, be sure to add it to your Watchlist. kelapstick (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Singleton-Clarke

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lori Singleton-Clarke, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://finance.yahoo.com/taxes/article/108550/nurse-outduels-irs-over-mba-tuition?mod=taxes-advice_strategy. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lori Singleton-Clarke

The article Lori Singleton-Clarke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Known only for one event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lori Singleton-Clarke

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lori Singleton-Clarke. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Singleton-Clarke. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kresimir Chris Kunej at AfD again

An AFD you previously participated in is being done again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kresimir_Chris_Kunej_(3rd_nomination)Turqoise127 02:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lonelydeat.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Lonelydeat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SmartSE (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your kind words at Kresimir Chris Kunej AfD, even though it looks futile. I am sorry your opinion did not result great for you (your picture deleted), but it means a lot.Turqoise 127 00:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not require thanks, nor do I particularly wish to exchange comments with you, sorry. PamelaBMX 18:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barret Oliver

I believe your concerns at the AFD has been addressed. Might you care to revisit the Barret Oliver article and the AFD discussion? Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Regarding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barret Oliver. The article page has since been greatly improved. Perhaps you may wish to revisit your position in the AFD? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Berghuis v. Thompkins

Berghuis v. Thompkins has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]