User talk:Osmancancancan

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmancancancan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia, I did not know about policies much (I should have read the policies I know) but I unfortunately did not and I was not warned as I have seen in some talk pages of blocked users before I was blocked so that I could clean up my act. Just to be clear could I learn which of my edits led to the block?

Decline reason:

If you saw warnings on other users pages, you must have realised your edits would not be tolerated, all your edits are either vandalism or pov-pushing. The only edit which wasn't vandalism was your first, which was simply adding superflous information. Jac16888 ^Talk 20:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmancancancan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was told that I should have noted the warnings on talk pages but I have seen them after I am blocked

Decline reason:

If you don't know which of your edits were problematic, than you really shouldn't be editing. Jac16888 summarized your edits quite well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmancancancan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I have been misunderstood twice, I will try to state it as clearly as possible. I am new to wikipedia. I had no idea about the results of vandalism. I also know afterwards that I should have read the policies of wikipedia. But here is the problem; I was blocked right away without any warnings. After I was blocked I looked at other blocked profiles or whatever they are called in wikipedia and have seen that they all have got warnings before they were blocked, I dd not receive any. Because of all these I received no warning that would have definitely resulted in my clearing up my act behaving. Please hear me and understand me because I cannot tell my problem any clearer

Decline reason:

You had no idea about the results of vandalism? Whatever did you think the result would be? We don't bother warning people who do little but vandalize, so, there you have it. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock|Some of my edits were not even vandalism there were just POVs for unilaterally biased articles about Turkey. This is the first account created from this IP adress as the telephone link is new so why do you ban the IP indefinitely at least define the sentence. I learned my lesson

If you are unblocked, please give us a preview of how you plan to contribute to Wikipedia. Specifically, which articles/subjects are of the most interest to you, and how do you plan to help strengthen their content? Thank you. Pastor Theo (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment I am planning to improve articles on tennis, squash, skiing and other sports I will also be helping with the wikipedia about Turkey related issues. To be honest, I will also be trying to enforce NPOV policies in articles about Turkey which are biased and one sided. I will of course use legal methods such as using Talk pages and so on. --Osmancancancan (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - Since I was not ever warned I though I should give myself a warning eh? --Osmancancancan (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will check with the blocking admin. Please be patient on this. Thanks! Pastor Theo (talk) 00:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

As per discussion with the blocking admin, this account is unblocked.

Request handled by: Pastor Theo (talk) 04:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Pastor Theo (talk) 04:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, please be aware that you need to abide by Wikipedia procedures in editing, especially on subjects that may have a thorny political element to them. If you have any questions, feel free to call on me. Thanks! Pastor Theo (talk) 04:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]