User talk:Orchid Righteous

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Hello, Orchid Righteous! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Historical Districts[edit]

Hi, where did you get the map of Indiana's historical districts? And do you have other states as well? Thanks.

Graphics for Alabama districts[edit]

Hi, Just wanted to say that I saw the graphics you put on the first four Alabama districts and they look great. I did some stuff for the Louisiana ones, e.g. see [[1]], and my hope was to one day make such a historical table for all the districts in the US, but of course who knows when that will happen? In short, great work! --Deville (Talk) 14:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could I ask where you got the map for the district? It looks a lot like the ones from [nationalatlas.gov] but it's a bit different as well. Thanks! --Deville (Talk) 15:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more followup...;) Might I ask where you got the statistics, like area, demographic info? Thanks! --Deville (Talk) 04:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I use the national atlas pictures, although I usually just edit out the legend on the side as well as the title just for clarity's sake. After looking at yours on Louisiana's district I quite like the tables you do with colour showing past represenation - I'm not brilliant with the technical in's and out's of such things - was wondering if you could enlighten me as to how to create the tables / footnoting.I get the statistics from various state almanacs and such, and a few political journals. Since I'm doing my masters in political theory and districting I've collected resources on demographic information for Congressional districts for most states. I'm back from overseas so I expect I'll be casting my hand at continuing to expand information on congresspeople and their districts. Orchid Righteous

For the color, I'm not sure where I stole that from, but if you look at the source you can see that it just takes one code in the HTML to color each entry in the table. Take a look, and if you have any more questions let me know. In the meantime, I've found a pretty good source for info, namely here, which has some of the demographic info for each district. Anyway, one of my projects is to get all of these districts done at some point, but it's coming slowly. --Deville (Talk) 17:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I also mention that the picture at Alabama Congressional Districts is extremely awesome. I'm guessing you made this with Photoshop? In any case, it works quite well. I've been slowly getting some of the district articles up to what I think is a good standard; I've essentially included your ideas for what you did in Alabama, and what another user did for Nebraska, and I'm thinking about making a loose standard to propose on the Congress Wikiproject. If you have a chance, take a look at what I've done for the Arizona and Louisiana districts; I'd really like to hear any feedback you migtht have.

Also, if you don't mind me asking, how does someone from Canberra become interested in the Congressional districts of Alabama? I'd be hard pressed to find Americans interested enough in this topic...:-) --Deville (Talk) 05:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a standard would be good. I personally best like the political character sections, but its been an evolutionary process and I'm working on the congressmen simultaneously, and since I work a fair bit + my studies I never seem to get enough time. See The fifth district as the most current conception of how I think it should be. I got rid of the Safe v Marginal bar because it became too hard to objectively quantify, and it was entering into the realm of my own opinion. I've always been fascinated in US Politics, possibly because Australian politics is so dull by comparison. After I've done my honours (which Im doing on US political polarity) i plan to do my Doctorate in US government at UC Berkeley. Heres hoping. And yes, I did do the congressional district map in photoshop, it takes a bit of perseverence but it does look good in the end. Orchid Righteous 15:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Ah this makes sense then. Also, grad school at Berkeley has to be awesome. I was just there, actually, two weeks ago; I have a collaborator in the math department there so I spend a week or so in Berkeley and surrounding areas. It actually wasn't quite what I expected, but I guess I was thinking more 60's Berkeley or something. But what's especially nice about Northern California is that without much trouble you can be in some really nice country (here in NYC, to get to good countryside you need to go infinitely far). Anyway, I'm sure you'll have a lot of fun there, and I imagine that the political science department there would be quite strong (I know the math department is). --Deville (Talk) 00:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:AlabamaDHist.png: The 9th district became obsolete after the 1960 census and the 8th district became obsolete after the 1970 census, yet the graphic depicts both districts becoming obsolete at the same time. Would you be able to modify the graphic to show the difference in date of obsolecence? Other than that, great work and excellent graphs! --G1076 19:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For Alabama's 6th district, Spencer T. Bachus III went unopposed, making his time un office go to 2008. I wouldn't know how, but could you modify the graphic for that page? Jordan 21:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grey collar[edit]

in the Alabama district articles (for example, Alabama's 3rd congressional district, there is mention of "Grey collar" in demographics. Can you please link it to something or explain for me (and other readers) what "grey collar" means? Thanks!!!—Markles 19:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barksdale Merges[edit]

Thanx for handling that. I requested the merge a long, long time ago and forgot to go back and do it myself. ;) — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 11:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new template[edit]

Greetings. Check out Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_U.S._Congress#Infobox_for_Districts. :) – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 17:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guildford[edit]

Thanks for that! Been meaning to follow up on that one SatuSuro 12:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Better Source Request for Image:RichardShelbyXtra.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RichardShelbyXtra.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. MECU≈talk

Unspecified source for Image:RobertAderholt.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RobertAderholt.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tomf688 (talk - email) 21:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fiona Stanley.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fiona Stanley.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 17:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

100,000,000 Guinea pigs[edit]

xlnt work on the revision on the 100,000,000 Guinea Pigs! you removed the chapter titles, why? Benkeboy 19:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at the Talk pages of the 100,000,000 Guinea Pigs. There is question regarding the picture you uploaded for this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:100%2C000%2C000_Guinea_Pigs Benkeboy (talk) 15:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nolan Charts[edit]

I have removed all the Nolan Charts which you created for politicians from their respective articles. They are violations of WP:NOR. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 12:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ADALogo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ADALogo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AMFPA Logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AMFPA Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aix-En-ProvenceFestival.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aix-En-ProvenceFestival.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aix-En-ProvenceFestival.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aix-En-ProvenceFestival.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project Congress[edit]

As a participant of WikiProject U.S. Congress, please consider placing {{Project Congress to do}} to the top of your User_talk page. Thank you. —Markles 15:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:AlabamaDistricts.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AlabamaDistricts.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Julia Carson2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Julia Carson2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:IN-CD-Changes.PNG[edit]

File:IN-CD-Changes.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:IN-CD-Changes.PNG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:IN-CD-Changes.PNG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BudCramerPC.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BudCramerPC.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US National Archives collaboration[edit]

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlabamaDistricts.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AlabamaDistricts.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alabama1Spec.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alabama1Spec.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alabama2Spec.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alabama2Spec.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alabama3Spec.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alabama3Spec.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

need outside opinions in Crown of Castile[edit]

I have asked for outside opinions in Crown of Castile, the question is Did the the Crown of Castile end in 1812 or in 1715? I am notifying you because you have made non-trivial edits to the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RepJoBonner.gif missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:RepJoBonner.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Alabama7Hist.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama1Hist.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama3Hist.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama5Hist.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama2Hist.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama6Hist.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Alabama4Hist.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:AlabamaDHist.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup[edit]

Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RepJoBonner.gif[edit]

The file File:RepJoBonner.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MarionBerryMedicare.jpg[edit]

The file File:MarionBerryMedicare.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alabama4Hist.png[edit]

The file File:Alabama4Hist.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a graph of party control of Alabama's 4th congressional district, but is out of date. Additionally, this information is already represented in the article in table, which has more detail (such as the name of the incumbent). Orphaned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. House Blaster^talk 17:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alabama5Hist.png[edit]

The file File:Alabama5Hist.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a graph of party control of Alabama's 5th congressional district, but is out of date. Additionally, this information is already represented in the article in table, which has more detail (such as the name of the incumbent). Orphaned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. House Blaster^talk 17:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MikeDRogersPC.png[edit]

The file File:MikeDRogersPC.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JoBonnerPC.jpg[edit]

The file File:JoBonnerPC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RobertAderholtPC.png[edit]

The file File:RobertAderholtPC.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]