User talk:OI-10-e.escobosa
Welcome[edit]
|
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pagoeta natural park, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.turismoa.euskadi.net/s11-12375/en/contenidos/g_naturaleza/0000004922_g2_rec_turismo/en_4922/4922-ficha.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. In addition to rules against copying or closely paraphrasing content, I'm afraid that Wikipedia also cannot accept directly translated material. The right to prepare translations of content is reserved to the copyright holder under U.S. law. The content you added on the climate to this article seems to be a machine translation of [1], as it is not only similar in structure but includes some words that the machine could not translate. I'm working to address the close paraphrasing issues in this article, but please be very careful to ensure that your future contributions are within the guidelines at Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you have questions about how to rewrite material sufficiently to avoid problems, you're very welcome to come by my talk page.
- Incidentally, some of the content has been removed as more suitable to a guide book than to an encyclopedia entry. Both are valid sources of information, of course, but their aims are different. If you are connected to this park, as your edits might suggest, please review our conflict of interest guidelines and our FAQ for organizations, as this might help you get a good overview of how best to contribute information about this park.
- Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)