User talk:NotTooSmooth

Speedy deletion nomination of Media craft Associates[edit]

Hello NotTooSmooth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Media craft Associates for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Csgir (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Csgir, thanks for your review and drawing my attention to the errors in the article. It's my first article and I'm learning how to create articles that are encyclopedic. I want to improve on it by removing things that makes it promotional or advertising. But it's so sad to inform you that the article has already been deleted without giving me time to work on it by introducing additional sources and removing promotional items. Can you kindly restore the article let me work on it. Kind regards. NotTooSmooth (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in University of Lagos, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JAH2k (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Versace1608. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Osagie Ize-Iyamu, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 14:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the rollback. But if you check the article very well you would have seen that I didn't just made up the date of birth. The date of birth is in the infobox and has been there for long time without removing. I only added it in the first line as it is the standard for articles about people alive or dead. Thanks. NotTooSmooth (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. I just removed the date of birth from the infobox. If you want to re-add it to the article, you will need to provide a reliable source to support your edit. Thank you. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plaqad Inc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plaqad Inc moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Plaqad Inc, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lapablo, thank you for your edit on the article I recently created. But your action is at best in bad faith and at worse vandalism. There are clearly established editorial rules and policies but you apparently ignored those rules. In your remark you said the article is undersourced and that information that cannot be verified should be removed. The question begging for answers is this: why did you not remove the unsourced information and leave the article there? Why did you not flag it for more citations? Why did you not open a discussion on the article's talk page and allow other editors to contribute? Your action is unilateral and has no bases in WP editorial policies. The article was created and remained in the main space for three months before it went life and no one challenged it but you came and took down the entire article. You call yourself deletetionist and that's what you are but that's vandalism at its best. You said on your userpage that you do not know why people ignore common sense in place of process but you should understand that process is established to guide the actions of all editors. Be aware that if everyone should use common sense in place of process WP would not be what it is today.

I do not know who you are and where you are or what you believe in but I beg you in the name of God to kindly restore the article. I have seen that you're a supper human and better than all other people but do not frustrate other people in their contributions. I'm not challenging you because I know that it will be futile to do so. But please restore the article. thanks. NotTooSmooth (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Ugbedeg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Plaqad Inc[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Plaqad Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Femi Falodun for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Femi Falodun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femi Falodun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 15:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]