User talk:NoseyMoose
Tamaryn
[edit]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Crowingfortruth (talk • contribs) 09:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, crowingfortruth. I’m sorry to break it to you, but Wikipedia doesn’t work like that. We can’t not add information because someone thinks it’s too personal. If Tamaryn felt her childhood was too personal, she would not have talked about it in a number of interviews. And as long as the information is coming from reliable sources, and it is, the information can be included. The page, being a biography of a living person, is as much about her music as it is about her life before it, and telling people to leave it alone because it’s too personal goes against the stated aim of Wikipedia. NoseyMoose (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- NoseyMoose, just a heads up, I opened up a sockpuppet investigation, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crowingfortruth. There are far too many similarities in the edits on Tamaryn. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Luk3, thanks for the heads up. It would appear to be an open-and-shut case now that they've admitted to being the same user. NoseyMoose (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- NoseyMoose, just a heads up, I opened up a sockpuppet investigation, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crowingfortruth. There are far too many similarities in the edits on Tamaryn. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Youth Code
[edit]What "it seems to you" doesn't follow our policies on wikipedia. Sources have to be wp:RS and bloggers are people who are not professional. This source isn't present on any article on en.wikipedia.org. http://www.cvltnation.com/cvlt/about/ present themselves as bloggers. Woovee (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Upon further research, there appears to be a lot of grey area between what separates an online magazine from a blog. Apparently anyone can rebrand their blog as a magazine to make themselves appear more reputable and attractive to readers. I won't use the site as a reference again and will instead look for another, more reliable source for the information in the article. Thank you for the edit. NoseyMoose (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Great contributions about Skinny Puppy
[edit]
|
Great contributions about Skinny Puppy |
| Man, your articles about Skinny Puppy are awesome! Write more! I want to know more about newer albums. Thank you so much for your work! MMetalSnake (talk) 05:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC) |
Replaceable fair use File:Images in Vogue.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Images in Vogue.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 01:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Majora and thank you for the heads up. Apparently the band is indeed sorta active today, releasing an album with several original songs and, as recently as 2013, performing live shows. This image does indeed violate the first criterion and I will remove it from the article. I'm not sure how to delete it myself, but I suppose an admin will do so on the first of the month. I'm trying to make the article as appealing as possible, and nearly every article about Images in Vogue says that they broke up in 1991; I did not mean to break policy. Sadly, there does not seem to be any freely licensed images of the group, but I ultimately don't think the article will suffer. Again, thank you very much for notifying me of this issue. NoseyMoose (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Images in Vogue.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Images in Vogue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
[edit]The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.
You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, NoseyMoose. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NoseyMoose. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devils in my Details, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative press (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy Earth day!
[edit]
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
|
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
  
|
| |||
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Tamaryn
[edit]This Tamaryn. It was brought to my attention by a fan on instagram last night that misquoted aticles about me are being used on this site. I saw the page and the way you pick and choosed text sounds racist and out of context. I am requesting the early childhood section be deleted entirely. Please consider. My email for verification is [email protected]. Stay safe out there! — Preceding unsigned comment added by OfficialTamaryn (talk • contribs) 21:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, I meant no harm in what I added to the article. Those quotes are, after all, attributed directly to Tamaryn, and were published through credible news sources. That said, editing your own Wikipedia article (or having someone else do it for you) is a major conflict of interest and is strictly against Wikipedia's guidelines. I probably wont edit the article again unless there's obvious vandalism/formatting issues, but I'd advise that you refrain from editing the page in the future. NoseyMoose (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)