User talk:NormandyD-Day1944

March 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Li Xueqin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zanhe (talk) 06:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're User:白骨青灰. You already got blocked on zh-wiki; if you vandalize again, you'll be blocked on en-wiki as well. -Zanhe (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Zanhe (talk) 07:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship and Threats. Falsified historical event sequence.NormandyD-Day1944 (talk) 07:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NormandyD-Day1944 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If Wikipedia promotes pseudohistory at will and neglects the necessity to critically judge if a person's life event sequence has been twisted (inserted/deleted/permuted) to serve whatever purpose, then Wikipedia no longer serves its initial purpose to do good for society declared in 2001. When Wikipedia contents no longer adhere to society's fair use expectations, then to respect the right of its original authors (some are still active since 2001), Wikipedia must accept an author's request to retract contents due to breach of mutual agreement. True history is written by brave historians. In old times they guarded truth with life. In order to protect themselves from revealing truth that are wanted by society but inconvenient for some, pen names have helped to protect their identity.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NormandyD-Day1944 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My purpose was not to appeal the block anyhow - there is just no specific tag to indicate my purpose. I plan to quit Wikipedia (and advocate my experience in as many languages as there are audiences) as I firmly believe there is nothing for me to miss. My request is to retract all my past contribution. I request to retract all my contents so nothing will cause you "damage or disruption", and "useful contributions" can be enjoyed without my material. I made contributions since years before 2005. Is there a way to raise this breach of agreement issue without further insisting your authority as everybody already gets it?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As much as authority is enjoyed among some, in some schools of teaching using authority to oppress will not work, even locked up in a prison. Just so it is clear.

Your contributions to Wikipedia were released - by you - under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported licence. This licence cannot be revoked and thus your contributions cannot be retracted on request, although they may be removed in the process of normal editing. Please do not use the {{unblock}} template unless you are actually appealing against your block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]