User talk:NoObsceneUsernames

Do not use bad words on Wikipedia. Not even in your username. The administrators may block you without further notice. --NoObsceneUsernames (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making edits at Talk:Eritrea, Talk:Capital punishment, and Malé which make it evident that your only intention here is to disrupt Wikipedia. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Rich wales 04:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't use bad language.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoObsceneUsernames (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't use bad language. Sorry for what I did. Can you please unblock me? NoObsceneUsernames (talk) 15:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the fact that essentially all of your edits are vandalism. Kinu ^t/_c 15:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How long?[edit]

How long is my block? --NoObsceneUsernames (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please...[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoObsceneUsernames (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my edits are vandalism. I promise that I will stop doing whatever got me blocked, and that this will not happen again. I intend to help contribute to the encyclopedia within the grounds of your policies after I'm unblocked. You log all my contributions, and there is no point in denying something that I did do. Edits by me can and will be checked. NoObsceneUsernames (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, we have nothing else to judge you than many silly, childlike edits. If you're unclear on "whatever got [you] blocked", then I see no reason to assume you won't repeat the behavior. Kuru (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoObsceneUsernames (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I promise, further disruptive edits will never be made again. NoObsceneUsernames (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per the above additional info, I've expanded NoObsceneUsernames's indefinite block to include e-mail and talk page blocks. In the unlikely event that the user has valid reasons to dispute the checkuser findings, he should contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. — Rich wales 04:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]