User talk:Njoudyk/sandbox

peer review[edit]

This article is well organized but I have some suggestions 1- Tf you add the citation near the sentence to make it easier to reach the source and verified the information. 2- Try to write a brief definition of the title. I think it will be better to have some background of the title.Albahrani Batool (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC) I hope that my comments help to improve your article.[reply]

peer review #2[edit]

hello Nujoud, I like your addition to the article it is so organised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahaf M Hassan91 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

peer review #3[edit]

hello, you have added a lot of important information that the article can benefit from. just one suggestion, the section on polymorphic repetitive elements seemed a bit unclear to me, could use some more explanation. overall, i think it is a very valuable contribution. thank you. Dishabhavsar (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]