User talk:Nicksaliar

October 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at I'm Gonna Getcha Good!, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Expand the article if you must, but please cite any information you add. Also see MOS:DATECOMMA. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on You Win My Love[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page You Win My Love, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:California Girls (Gretchen Wilson song) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:California Girls (Gretchen Wilson song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: California Girls (Gretchen Wilson song) (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at All Jacked Up. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage in album reviews does not contribute to a song's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:California Girls (Gretchen Wilson song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nicksaliar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blessed (Martina McBride song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James House. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Best of SHeDAISY, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A Mind of Its Own. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 21:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Feelings of Forever. Stop adding your own analysis! Binksternet (talk) 04:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You gotta stop...[edit]

...adding your own analysis to music articles. Stop comparing one song to another unless you cite a media source giving that exact comparison. Stop describing an artist's career success and how the song or album performed among the artist's works unless you are citing a WP:SECONDARY source making that exact comment. You must follow Wikipedia policies or your edits will be reverted. Binksternet (talk) 03:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, really. Stop. You added your own analysis to She Went Out for Cigarettes. You wrote that the song was "the second highest debut of the week", which would require comparing a number of references, a violation of WP:SYNTH. You wrote that the song was "Wright's first single since 'The Love That We Lost' from her second studio album Right in the Middle of It (1996) to not enter the top forty at country radio". This is not allowed because of WP:No original research. You would have to compare several references to arrive at that conclusion, and you have created your own piece of trivia about Wright that was not first published in WP:SECONDARY sources. Regarding Wright's Canada sales, you wrote that the song was "her lowest peaking song on the chart to date". Again, you can't position the song in her career arc without citing a published source saying that exact thing. All you can do is relay what the cited source says.

You also said in two places that the music video was filmed by Deaton-Flanigen Productions. This is not referenced at all.

Stop composing your own music reviews! Just summarize the sources. Binksternet (talk) 04:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop saying that a song or album was a "decent"[1] "least successful",[2] or a "minor" success for the artist, or a "commercial failure".[3] Just give the chart ranking. Binksternet (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CaliforniaGirls Gretchen Wilson.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CaliforniaGirls Gretchen Wilson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Twisted Angel. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at One (Faith Hill song). Stop deciding on your own whether a chart ranking is "minor". The term "Top 40" is its own thing, not to be decided by you. "Top five" and "top ten" is also your own construction, not used by the sources. Stop it. Binksternet (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sweet Right Here. Binksternet (talk) 15:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Knock on the Sky. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Absence of the Heart. Binksternet (talk) 03:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at On a Night like This (Trick Pony song). Binksternet (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Never Love You Enough (song). Binksternet (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Nicksaliar. Thank you for your work on You Don't Have to Go Home. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice page. A source is needed for the statement "it was Wilson's first ever single to miss the top forty", which I tagged as citation needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Labels[edit]

Hi there, just to let you know I reverted your addition of the labels to three years' worth of country number ones, as you did not provide any sources. If you wish to re-add the information, please make sure to add a reference for each song's label. Thanks! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 01:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at No Fear (Terri Clark song). Binksternet (talk) 04:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Biker Chick (single).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Biker Chick (single).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Biker Chick single.jpg[edit]

The page File:Biker Chick single.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ✗plicit 06:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]