User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).


I do not know why[edit]

I do not know why this page is prone to delete even though I said the words of the existing source of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ain_Shams_University_Faculty_of_Law — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egy writer (talkcontribs) 14:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • We're not permitted to copy text verbatim from other sources, see WP:COPYRIGHT. You need to rewrite the article in your own words. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions of Save the Planet Article[edit]

Hi you recently deleted an article I wrote - I assume for not meeting notoriety requirements? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Save_The_Planet&action=edit&redlink=1

Does the links on our media page make the external published requirement. http://www.voteplanet.net/in-the-news.html

I didn't understand wikipedia had such requirements before you deleted. It explains why there seemed to be quite a lot of information black holes in the wiki

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greycliffs (talkcontribs) 19:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The radio interviews probably save the article from being speedily deleted again. You should, however, delete the "goals and visions" section because that is basically advertising for the party. That's not permitted here, see WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks will have a read and modify accordingly Greycliffs (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Como Brothers Band Deletion[edit]

Dear NawlionWiki,

I do not understand why The Como Brothers Band Wikipedia page was deleted. I contested the deletion and it appears no one even looked at my objections. I request this page be restored. Read through the page and you will see that all information being relayed can be verified by third party persons. All facts written are referenced and sources are clearly outlined. All material is objective and unbiased. This page was not created for the promotion/advertisement of any person, place or product. It is simply ridiculous that I have no one to contact in matters regarding the deletion of the page. The Wikipedia page is needed to clarify information regarding the nature of the band, history, and its verified web sources. The band needs a source to relay which information is accurate as there have been several discrepancies. The Como Brothers Band has an imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6398859/

It has multiple reviews of their albums and performances from outside parties. To name a few:

Brian Lion of Under The Gun Review has praised the album, stating, "Pretty much the whole of Baby Steps is catchy as hell".[1] Brian Weidy of IX Daily’s reviewed the album, writing, "The Como Brothers Band excels on their debut".[2] Joshua Smotherman of Middle Tennessee Music writes, “Baby Steps includes track after track of grade A++ quality songwriting, musicianship, and originality” [3] James Wilson of My Random Jukebox speaks of Matt and Andrew’s songwriting abilities, stating, “How the music is put together alongside the catchy lyrics is a credit to their songwriting ability (which I think is their biggest talent)”.[4] I Am Entertainment Magazine wrote, “It’s just a matter of time before these guys explode into the mainstream”.[5] Please help me to resolve this problem. If you can point me to a contact that is capable of recovering deleted page let me know. Thank you. Marissa Smith Bco66209 (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please add my article back[edit]

Hi, recently you have deleted my article KingBob. I have proof that he is a real person if you search his facebook page for Sourab Bobby Ganna. In our school he has a huge following for his varsity basketball skills. Please add this page back! I am a proven member on the wikipedia star wars fanon page under the username Darth Ultima and I have spent over 200 hours writing articles and editing. I feel that you deleting my page almost immediately ruins the legitimacy of this website because there are a lot of people unknown. Wikipedia gives them the option to be known. Please add my article back because I have provided proof of his existence and merits. When there are articles on fictional characters, why can I not create an article about a real one. Please add this article back because otherwise it is an abuse of your powers.

Suspected sock farm[edit]

I looked into Wikipedia:Help desk#Multiple user pages, all basically the same and saw you have blocked some but far from all users at Special:WhatLinksHere/George Molsbarger. You also found some not linking there such as User:Shebazones. The accounts quickly make 10-20 similar edits so somebody may be trying to build a large autoconfirmed sock farm. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wow, huge April Fool's hoax project. I think I've blocked them all, as well as deleting the hoax article George Molsbarger. Thanks so much! NawlinWiki (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for handling this. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TO THE MARKET: Survivor-made Goods[edit]

Hello there, NawlinWiki. Earlier today you deleted TO THE MARKET | Survivor-made Goods page for unambiguous advertising. Please let me know precisely why it received that label so that I may change it. That would be most helpful. Callmeladymary (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)callmeladymary[reply]

George Molsbarger[edit]

Given the rarity of that name, would it be appropriate to salt the article so that it doesn't get recreated by another vandal? Dismas|(talk) 20:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One Spark (festival)[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, I went to create a new One Spark (festival) page but it said previously there was one written as an ad and you removed it. I'd like to create one (I never saw the previous one). Shall I just go ahead and do that? Thanks Nichos (talk) 03:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite An Article[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, I am a writer who notice you had a lot of vandalism going on a specific article. I would like to rewrite it with you blessing and reading it before it posted. The article has been auto-confined and can't write anything or correct an article and since you blocked I was wondering can send you the article and you decide if it notable or not. Thanks JamesWriter90 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DDnard[edit]

Dear NawlinWiki, with reference to your speedy deletion of the DDnard page, I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on why the subject did not meet the notability criterion, and how this can be rectified. I am always careful when creating a Wiki to abide by the guidelines and believed that this particular entry satisfied them. The subject is a bestselling author (1.4million copies worldwide and counting) and is one of Thailand's most popular, if not the most popular, author and self-help gurus. She is also a leading entrepreneur and public figure in Thailand, who regularly appears in the national media. I have cited numerous secondary sources (albeit, most in Thai) that support these claims, and they are from reliable and editorially independent. These include an interview with a prime-time Thai TV chat show (one of many), and an extended feature on DDnard in a legitimate, mainstream Thai magazine. These meet the 'significant coverage' criterion, and there are numerous other Thai articles, from multiple sources, that I could cite to further illustrate the subject's notability. DDnard is to Thailand what, say, Tony Robbins is to America, or Paul McKenna is to the UK, and her international profile is rising rapidly. I look forward to hearing from you. Gruntfuttock115 (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will need to translate and look at the Thai sources. The only English one, Frost magazine, appears to be a PR blog that will post anyone's advertorials unedited. I'll get back to you. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Nawlin. In the meantime I will look for more English-language secondary sources. Gruntfuttock115 (talk) 09:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, I wanted to see how the translation of the Thai sources was going. Also, I have more English-language sources now, so am keen to revise the DDnard Wiki. I look forward to hearing from you Gruntfuttock115 (talk) 14:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia:COIN#Gruntfuttock115_and_Palamades_PR SmartSE (talk) 20:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, thank you for re-instating the page. I have updated the page with the latest sales figures for the book, from 1.4m to 1.5m, with an appropriate third-part citation. I have also declared a potential COI. Gruntfuttock115 (talk) 12:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Article[edit]

Hey Nawlin, Grenada (small island in the Caribbean) is finally catching up with the rest of the world by having a Music Publishing company. I really want to document this, so I intend to attempt my first article once again, hopefully in a less solicitous manner. This note is just to ask please for your patience and not to be blocked, as I have read is the policy, if it takes me more tries than I'd care to confess. It is not my intention to be difficult, I am simply new to creating content on Wikipedia. I will continue to read the recommended articles and may follow some examples of others. In the interim, I welcome any and all advice.

Thank you for understanding.

RozelleMcB (talk) 10:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)RozelleMcB[reply]

  • I'm not planning on blocking you. But even if this is the first company of its kind in Grenada, we can't have an article on it unless it is shown to be notable (see WP:CORP) by reliable, independent sources (see WP:V). Also, it appears from the name of the company that it is your own company. If so, you shouldn't be writing the article about it. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Skivington[edit]

Why have you deleted the page on Dean Skivington, I believe some of his work needs bring to wiki as its forward thinking and talks about tackling climate change, carbon tax mechanism. I don't think you have the right to delete this, its bias against his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuckinahole (talkcontribs) 02:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted the page on Dean Skivington, I believe some of his work needs bring to wiki as its forward thinking and talks about tackling climate change, carbon tax mechanism. I don't think you have the right to delete this, its bias against his work.

Plz tell me[edit]

You removed my message from talk:main page,now tell me where i have to complain w.punjabi wikipedia?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saleem1511 (talkcontribs) 03:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If I am understanding you correctly, you are complaining about administrators' behavior on the Punjabi Wikipedia. You would need to post on the Administrators' Noticeboard page there. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent Guidance[edit]

Actually, i am writing about a person being a third person. The article is well written keeping all policies of Wikipedia in mind. However, it is the article about Nitin Dabas whose page is earlier deleted by you. Its my humble request to you that kindly review that page, it fully different and original content with notability and reliable source. So, i am requesting you to please approve this page.Ruhilgoyal (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article didn't cite any *independent* sources (see WP:V - Mr. Dabas and his blog are not independent sources) to show this person's notability per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Article[edit]

Hello Nawlin,

I noticed that you deleted my Lynn Abbey Lee page. i know you were just doing your job, but i had to step out for a while to do something important, leaving my article totally blank except for one source-lol- but i was hoping that you could re-open it for me so i could continue working on it. Sorry for the inconvenience.

-Lauren HowlingAngel (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:NawlinWoki[edit]

User:NawlinWoki just registered, FYI. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PROD contested[edit]

Hello. Just so you know, I've contested your PROD on Beech Hill Pond as there are now a fair number of sources. --Jakob (talk) 00:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some SD nominations[edit]

I have nominated some pages for SD under desired criteria. Let me know if I did anything wrong. Most of my nominated pages has got deleted by admins. I am new editor fighting against vandalism. A.Minkowiski (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
you are good in editing...be with Wikipedia Kurt Penberg 15:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocking user 24.159.204.50 indefintely?[edit]

I saw that vandalism was again reverted by Cluebot NG on the Maine State Symbols page, and it appears that 24.159.204.50 is at it after their temporary block. Seeing as how this is a violation of their block, should the user be blocked permanently? Thanks, --Stratocaster27(talk) 13:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • That's not typical Wikipedia policy. Per Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses, "IP addresses should almost never be indefinitely blocked. Many IP addresses are dynamically assigned and change frequently from one person to the next, and even static IP addresses are periodically re-assigned or have different users." NawlinWiki (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gotcha. Just wanted to give you a heads up seeing as you implemented the temporary block. Cheers, Stratocaster27(talk) 20:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Trams in Singapore[edit]

Hi, regarding your edits on the wiki page; Trams in Singapore.

"Re-introduction plans (future):

   Tampines Tram (along Pasir Ris, Tampines North, Tampines, Simei & Bedok)
   Woodlands Tram (along the Woodlands area)
   Jurong Regional Tram, in place of Jurong Region Line"

Please kindly provide the relevant references to support the claims. Without proper official references, it would mislead others on the your claims. The places you have mentioned will be covered by future MRT lines, and there are no plans on re-introducing trams back in Singapore, based on current MasterPlan 2013 and LTA. Unless you can provide reference sources, you may feel free to edit your posts again. =) 220.255.2.83 (talk) 09:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Charamba[edit]

You previously, 20 November 2006, deleted the Charles Charamba article for lack of content. In September 2007, editor Redvers deleted it for copyright violation. I hope the new article (16 April 2014) meets with your approval. --Bejnar (talk) 02:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why ?[edit]

Hi, I don't understand why you've deleted my article about a real hip hop group. This band is active at the present and just made a release few month ago that is sell on Itunes. I'm almost 10000 km far away from it, this people can't be my friend. Could you explain me why you've done this please ? Eimere (talk) 22:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You need to cite independent, reliable sources, see WP:V, to show that this group meets our notability standards, see WP:BAND. Having a release on Itunes isn't sufficient. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted...[edit]

I was in the process of making a page for a model, and you delete it? He is notable as you can find out: https://www.motmodel.com/Detail.aspx?model_id=6914 and http://www.elliottbrownagency.co.uk/portfolio.asp?entrytype=Men&ID=3330 he is very successful at the moment. Don't delete it until I have finished, then you can decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug2745 (talkcontribs) 11:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Being listed on a modeling agency's website doesn't make him notable, see WP:BIO. You need to find reliable independent sources (WP:V) showing how he is notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Ukraine[edit]

I was in the process of making a page for the idea of Federal Ukraine, and you delete it! Don't delete it until I have finished, then you can decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.247.57.116 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • See WP:V. Please don't post original ideas or synthesis. Wait to post an article until you've found reliable independent sources discussing the concept. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
you did well Pauldillion12345 (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin Wiki. The end of Google News archives makes writing articles more difficult these days, but I think that the subject of Three Twins may indeed be notable the assertion that it is the first organic ice cream brand in the U.S. is I think enough to make it worth at least a proper deletion discussion rather than a speedy deletion. Would you consider taking it to a full AfD so we can see what others think and what sources people may be able to turn up? Thank for your kind consideration. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Happy Easter. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Como Brothers Band Deletion[edit]

Dear NawlionWiki,

I do not understand why The Como Brothers Band Wikipedia page was deleted. I contested the deletion and it appears no one even looked at my objections. I request this page be restored. Read through the page and you will see that all information being relayed can be verified by third party persons. All facts written are referenced and sources are clearly outlined. All material is objective and unbiased. This page was not created for the promotion/advertisement of any person, place or product. It is simply ridiculous that I have no one to contact in matters regarding the deletion of the page. The Wikipedia page is needed to clarify information regarding the nature of the band, history, and its verified web sources. The band needs a source to relay which information is accurate as there have been several discrepancies. The Como Brothers Band has an imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6398859/

It has multiple reviews of their albums and performances from outside parties. To name a few:

  • Brian Lion of Under The Gun Review has praised the album, stating, "Pretty much the whole of Baby Steps is catchy as hell".[1]
  • Brian Weidy of IX Daily’s reviewed the album, writing, "The Como Brothers Band excels on their debut".[2]
  • Joshua Smotherman of Middle Tennessee Music writes, “Baby Steps includes track after track of grade A++ quality songwriting, musicianship, and originality” [3]
  • James Wilson of My Random Jukebox speaks of Matt and Andrew’s songwriting abilities, stating, “How the music is put together alongside the catchy lyrics is a credit to their songwriting ability (which I think is their biggest talent)”.[4]
  • I Am Entertainment Magazine wrote, “It’s just a matter of time before these guys explode into the mainstream”.[5]

Please help me to resolve this problem. If you can point me to a contact that is capable of recovering deleted page let me know. Thank you. Marissa Smith Bco66209 (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Como Brothers Band Deletion[edit]

Dear NawlionWiki,

I do not understand why The Como Brothers Band Wikipedia page was deleted. I contested the deletion and it appears no one even looked at my objections. I request this page be restored. Read through the page and you will see that all information being relayed can be verified by third party persons. All facts written are referenced and sources are clearly outlined. All material is objective and unbiased. This page was not created for the promotion/advertisement of any person, place or product. It is simply ridiculous that I have no one to contact in matters regarding the deletion of the page. The Wikipedia page is needed to clarify information regarding the nature of the band, history, and its verified web sources. The band needs a source to relay which information is accurate as there have been several discrepancies. The Como Brothers Band has an imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6398859/

It has multiple reviews of their albums and performances from outside parties. To name a few:

Brian Lion of Under The Gun Review has praised the album, stating, "Pretty much the whole of Baby Steps is catchy as hell".[1] Brian Weidy of IX Daily’s reviewed the album, writing, "The Como Brothers Band excels on their debut".[2] Joshua Smotherman of Middle Tennessee Music writes, “Baby Steps includes track after track of grade A++ quality songwriting, musicianship, and originality” [3] James Wilson of My Random Jukebox speaks of Matt and Andrew’s songwriting abilities, stating, “How the music is put together alongside the catchy lyrics is a credit to their songwriting ability (which I think is their biggest talent)”.[4] I Am Entertainment Magazine wrote, “It’s just a matter of time before these guys explode into the mainstream”.[5] Please help me to resolve this problem. If you can point me to a contact that is capable of recovering deleted page let me know. Thank you. Marissa Smith Bco66209 (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pogoseat[edit]

Hello. After moving "Pogo seat" (created by a new editor) to "Pogoseat", I saw it was deleted in a AfD processa few months ago. Although the article has some interesting media coverage, I wanted to notify you about this, let's say, issue. --BiH (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • No problem, looks like there are better sources now. Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 13:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Thank you :) Ishdarian 22:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection? User_talk:JamesBWatson[edit]

It appears that the socks all have 1 edit. Would not semi-protection work just fine here?--v/r - TP 19:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The last one was an autoconfirmed sleeper account. But it's been a couple of hours, so I will actually unprotect and see what happens. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The revdel'd material? I hadn't seen that. That makes more sense now but not sure I'd have done it like that. But it's moot now since you've unprotected it. Thanks.--v/r - TP 21:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request on UTRS[edit]

NawlinWiki - could you please comment on this appeal?--v/r - TP 22:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spambot break[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, after a bit of a spambot hiatus over the holiday, they are now started up again, particularly some are very heavy cross wiki posters, so worth checking the global contribs to see if there is anything to revert. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About Veron[edit]

You deleted my previous article about Veron(Software) because it was in A7 & G11 criteria. I want to recreate about this article & i hope in this time it will not in those criteria. FaisalNipun (talk) 15:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SiriusDecisions[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, I'm hoping to discuss the speedy deletion of the SiriusDecisions page, which I think fell under A7 criteria. I reviewed WP:CORP prior to posting the article and again after its deletion. In avoiding puffery, I think I didn't state clearly enough why the organization is notable. Since I did have citations from prominent sources (Forbes, AdAge, etc), is it worth recreating the article if I were to clarify notability? Thank you. JWY26989 (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OER inquiry[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Filter[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, you don't know me personally but I have written a few good article and some was poorly written. I have been lacking good faith but I have learn my lesson and I want us to work together instead of against one another. I do apologize for my sock action and would like to be restated. I do go to college and it's public wifi so my IP address is always the same. Can I email you my new article I have written for you approval???? Maz132 (talk) 07:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Споменица за тебе![edit]

Општа споменица
Zasto ste obrisali stranicu Timok Trnavac Kocic Stefan (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Page Deleted - Southside Wrestling Entertainment[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki. I've made several changes to my contribution for Southside Wrestling Entertainment which can currently be found in my sandbox - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cobystag/sandbox - Please could you have a quick look and advise as to whether the article has been written to Wikipedia's standards as of yet? And if not, what I can do to improve? Thank you. Cobystag (talk) 13:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You still only have citations to two sources other than SWE itself, and both appear to be wrestling blogs. Is there any coverage in more mainstream news sources, see WP:RS? NawlinWiki (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki. I have links to an article written by rohwrestling.com (Ring Of Honor being an American promotion existing since 2002 with it's own wiki page) about an upcoming match they co-promoted with Southside and an announcement made by Fighting Spirit Magazine for a future Southside match, FSM also being a monthly magazine published in England since 2006. So I thought them to be pretty mainstream if that point could be argued? Thank you for the reply tho, I really would like to get this article printed for the time and effort I'm putting forth and I want it to deserve it's spot on wiki. Cobystag (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, could you please respond to the above if possible? I do have two links to mainstream sources as you cited earlier. If Ring Of Honor and Fighting Spirit Magazine are considered mainstream (for wrestling) would that not be the justification for a page for Southside to be created? Thank you for your time Cobystag (talk) 10:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, if all they are are listings of upcoming events, I don't see how that counts as significant coverage, see WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, the ROH article was written as it was the first time their title belt was defended outside of North America. The event has since passed and the match took place. Would that not be justification of significant coverage? Thank you for your time. Cobystag (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

T in the Park articles[edit]

I guess the opacity of this old edit summary of yours is an intentional piece of WP:DENY, so your userpage is maybe the best way to bring this back up: since that article was unprotected last month, a lot of the content has come back, and a new user stepped on their fifth ever edit in to move it all to its own article at Anti-social behaviour at T in the Park (in the same style as Neds and anti-social behaviour at T in the Park which you deleted with another WP:DENY "Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban" last year). --McGeddon (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 31 again[edit]

Causing issues with table editing again as per [1]. Cheers, Black Kite (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pissed Consumer speedy deletion[edit]

Hi Nawlin,

I appreciate your comments explaining Pissed Consumer article speedy removal. PissedConsumer.com was highlighted on Forbes, The New York Times, CNN Money, and other significant sources. I would like to add this information into the article. Please be so kind to prvide me with access to the article editing so that I can make the necessary changes.

Thank you for your support, Alex Syrov (talk) 11:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi NawlinWiki! Thank you for opening the article in my userspace! I have edited Pissed Consumer article. Now it has more notable sources.

Regards, Alex Syrov (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to badimages[edit]

Do you think an edit filter is feasible to deal with socks of 1abacada (talk · contribs) who have discovered that they can redirect pages to files on the bad images list? This seems like something the EF can prevent, at least for autoconfirmed users (though I can't see a reason why anyone would need to make a redirect from article space to a file under any usual circumstances). The latest sock is X X X X1anaacada (talk · contribs) who really likes to use that particular file. Acroterion (talk) 13:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Modified #58, let's see if that helps. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, it was rather shocking when one of his socks hit my talk page. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CorePower Yoga Deletion[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki,

I'm curious as to why you deleted the CorePower Yoga article. CorePower Yoga is the largest yoga company in the United States, with nearly 100 studios in 11 states. It is extremely influential to the U.S. yoga community and this company, directly and indirectly, affects hundreds of thousands of yoga practitioners. They also appear almost daily in mainstream media across the country[6][7][8][9][10][11]. I believe this company meets the notability requirements.

I did not have the opportunity to view the article before it was deleted, so I'm not certain as to its quality. Due to a conflict of interest, I have refrained from writing an article about this company myself and have been diligently asking for another editor to create the article for a long time. I'm a little disheartened to see it deleted so quickly. Thanks for your insight.

Tadasanajoe (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article that I deleted cited no sources at all. I have no objection to someone posting a properly-sourced article that shows that the company meets WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Leve[edit]

Could you please explain what was promotional in the article Brett Leve so I can improve it? I just created it and before updating it further it tagged and suddenly delete. I couldn't even able to contest the nomination as the page was tagged at 19:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[3] and deleted at 19:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC). Please, help sir. Binvox (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article needs to be written in neutral language. Copy such as "where he drives the creative vision and business development opportunities" is promotional, not neutral. See [{WP:NPOV]]. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion and I will keep WP:NPOV in mind but can you please, userify the deleted material? This will be helpful for me. Binvox (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - now in your userspace at User:Binvox/Brett Leve. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Binvox (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JA Sock?[edit]

Are you sure ValuableAppendage is JarlaxleArtemis. My recollection was that JA was anti-Semetic, while VA seems to be a Zionist. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Positive. JA became violently pro-Israel and anti-Arab (and anti-European, and anti- other people) after he stopped being Grawp. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "reggae-punk"[edit]

Why would you delete my article, "Reggae-punk"? It's obviously a genre. It's a fusion between reggae and punk. Who cares if there's only one band that's popular for it? Why would you delete a obviously legit genre and claim that I "made it up"? "Reggae-punk" is a commonly-used term to describe the musical style of The Police. Just because you've never heard of it, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because I failed to provide references (which I could easily provide), it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There can be a genre that does not exist at all, but because of random sources found by the user, it stays on Wikipedia. Dark metal for example. If you seriously don't believe that it's a genre, please tell me what genre you would consider Outlandos D'Amour? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElectricFuneralFog (talkcontribs) 20:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "references (which I could easily provide)" Well, you need to do that. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello I am the guy that messed with Bill Murray's article I apologize it was an example of how fast wikipedia can be changed and reviewed and corrected, thank you for correcting so fast :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.45.126.230 (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am Tanveer Khan, why you guys delete my page, kaamdhandha and tanveer akhter khan. Kaamdhandha is important portal and tanveer akhter khan is real alumni!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me2tanveer (talkcontribs) 20:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I and others have explained on your talk page, you should not be using Wikipedia to promote yourself and your website. See WP:SPAM and WP:AUTO. Also, it's not enough for you to be "real", or for you to say your website is "important". You need to show, by citing reliable independent sources (see WP:V) that your website has been recognized as notable per our guidelines at WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

captain character[edit]

please,one right know!or you'II never good for you.as first,this is a new thing.captain characher took in to the id.wikitonary and so you can do and try.let me to the write please, I will ready myself as a article, but beware don't eliminate.--Ytipoli (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

oh,really,way,when you did happen cleareye,if so you gets your why I don't happening now.let's see.stop! ok.I'm giving.--85.102.204.29 (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

keep up the good work, man Ysleta61 (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memphis (Boz Scaggs album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock account[edit]

FYI, the "Lyndon Johnson account" is actually the fourth sock account created for the purposes of disrupting that AfD. I have a request for semiprotection of the AfD and I think that's necessary to prevent further dispurtion.[4] Coretheapple (talk) 15:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violating WP:OUTING[edit]

Your edit summary here attempts to identify editors by their work organization, where they had not disclosed on wiki where they work, which is a violation of WP:OUTING. You have my assurance that those accounts were not affiliated or directed by me, by the way. I'm just trying to improve Wikipedia from the perspective of the Reliance Globalcom network, as you can see my IP is hosted by. - 208.116.141.100 (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never said they were you. And it's not "outing" to identify the sockmaster of obvious sockpuppet accounts. They don't "work at" Mr Wiki Pro, Mr Wiki Pro is the account name of the sockmaster. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you for this explanation. I had no idea there was a User by that name, so I apologize for that misunderstanding. (Pro tip: it might help if you put "User" in the description.) I thought you might have been talking about the business MyWikiBiz, which has advised me on my edits to Reliance Globalcom, which User:Coretheapple is now trying to get deleted. - 208.116.141.100 (talk) 16:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But you said in the AfD[5] that "I have no affiliation with Reliance Globalcom, other than I happen to be logging into one of their WiFi hotspots today." Coretheapple (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you two continue this debate on your own talk pages or at the AFD? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, you can delete my comment. Coretheapple (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore my page[edit]

17:57, 13 May 2014 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted page Elvis: the misadventures of a boy and his father (A11: Obviously invented) 

This is the title that I got but the page isn't invented, its about my show and I am working very hard on it, and have a lot of videos released of it already www.youtube.com/in6seconds is my youtube channel, please restore my page becaue I just wanted to make a wikipedia of my show.

Please restore my page[edit]

17:57, 13 May 2014 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted page Elvis: the misadventures of a boy and his father (A11: Obviously invented) 

This is the title that I got but the page isn't invented, its about my show and I am working very hard on it, and have a lot of videos released of it already www.youtube.com/in6seconds is my youtube channel, please restore my page becaue I just wanted to make a wikipedia of my show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by In6seconds (talkcontribs) 16:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get my show on wikipedia then? because I know of many animated web shows on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by In6seconds (talkcontribs) 23:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you so much for reverting User: Mr Wiki Pro's vandalism to my user pages. I really don't know how to fully express my appreciation for this. LightandDark2000 (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is lundons bridge deleted?[edit]

Have I breached any of the rules in making this article? there are sources like imdb that have shownmthat lundons bridge is a real movie yet it got removed. could you tell me why and what I would have to do to get it back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lundons Bridge and The Three Keys (talkcontribs) 22:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page[edit]

I have fundamentally rewritten our deleted page. Do I just resubmit on the existing page? Or is there a special procedure? Best ZeroCarbonHub (talk) 11:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have now submitted the draft for review ZeroCarbonHub (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page of Company[edit]

I created a page for a non-profit organization called Helios Education Foundation. After reviewing the deleted page comments, I don't understand why the page was deleted and am asking that you reinstate it. The page was created to provide information regarding the organization and used references from the organizations website to support the content.

Please let me know when and if this page will be reinstated. Thanks! Iology Support (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Rachel[reply]

  • It's not enough to "use references from the organization's website". You need to show, by citation to *independent* sources, see WP:V, that the organization meets our notability standards, see WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page of Tours Company[edit]

You have speedily removed my page which I am a bit disappointed about. I followed a similar page's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iknow-UK) format but did not go into details about the specific products, just about the history, business model of the company. I can be even more generic, do you have a good example page I can use as a template to inform people of the business? It would be great to understand more, as I don't feel the original page was either advertising or promotional.

Thanks for your time.

Updated: I am about to update the page with a new version which I hope meets your requirements. Please feedback your thoughts.

Cclayton1979 (talk) 13:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article still does not cite independent sources indicating how the company is notable per our guidelines, see WP:CORP. I have also deleted the Iknow-UK article (but see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Muggle Quidditch Team Page.[edit]

Hello, i made a page about my real profesional Muggle Quidditch team. Only 2 minutes after i posted it the page was speedily deleted. I would like to know why. The content was real and legit and there was no reason the delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fboeft (talkcontribs) 17:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://id.wiktionary.org/wiki/kaptan[edit] enter on above the web site.You'll get it.the sources have on it--85.102.127.173 (talk) 17:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You need to cite reliable independent sources (see WP:V) to show that your group is notable per WP:ORG. Other wikis are user-edited and therefore not reliable sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

eat Nimnasewwandi (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opus Solutions[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki,

Thanks for your comments on my Talk page. I had the following points, which I would request your feedback:

1. We uploaded a corporate logo earlier today for Opus Software Solutions. We were in the process of submitting the copyright email to [email protected]. We now see that the logo is missing. Is there a reason this was removed?

2. One of my company's co-founders, by the name of Paresh Banerjee - his name was removed from the Founder(s) section. He is mentioned in our corporate website as well: http://www.opussoft.com/aboutus/team.php. Not sure why this was removed.

3. Under the Subsidiary section, the information that our subsidiary "ElectraCard Services was acquired by MasterCard on May 19, 2014 for an undisclosed amount" was removed. Any reason this was removed?

4. Under TYPE, Opus Software Solutions is a private firm. This was changes to Public. Any reason this was changed?

5. Under KEY PEOPLE, the name S Subramaniam was changed to Ramasubramaniam. That is his complete name. Any reason this was reverted to S Subramaniam?

I wanted to understand where we went wrong so that we do not repeat it. We do not plan to use this for sales purposes, but rather to have a wikipedia presence like any other company. If you are able to guide us, we will be much obliged.

Thank you - Opus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opus mukund (talkcontribs) 21:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've restored those changes, and removed the promotional copy "Opus's corporate vision is to be a globally admired technology partner of choice for the Payments industry." Please be mindful of WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These changes are still not reflected. Will this take time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.136.128 (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rhys Stevenson[edit]

Hi,

The inserted link is of a student that went to Bromfords School and is now a reputable music journalist having been nominated for 2 awards at the UK blog awards, studied at Essex University and his site "Global Metal Apocalypse" is recognized worldwide in the metal music industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowzgoth (talkcontribs) 22:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History Merge[edit]

NawlinWiki, would you kindly perform the history merger requested at Carpe Fulgur. Thank you in advance :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tank Man photo[edit]

NawlinWiki I removed the Tank Man photo which is credited to my blog because the photographer asked me to take it down. It is no longer on my blog. If you want to use that photo, find a new source. Please do not use my name, okay? (Mike Culpepper)CCBC (talk) 09:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC) My bad! It wasn't a mod who put the photo back. Sorry, NawlinWiki. (But I do hope that you will continue to keep the photo off -- at least with my name attached).CCBC (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the user only made two edits, the first to update an article, but without providing a source, and the second to post a message on the talk page of the user who reverted their edit, around the same time that talk page was being vandalised. The user was mentioned in a sockpuppetry case, but there was no evidence provided and no indication of connection to the other accounts. Was there checkuser confirmation that this was a sockpuppet either of Mr Wiki Pro or another user? Peter James (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REVDEL request[edit]

Please nuke.[6][7]. — goethean 16:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongly deleted article[edit]

Dear Sir: You deleted an article (Eurhytmy) wich is a new scientific concept developed by a group of researchers from CEFCUL (http://cfcul.fc.ul.pt/) lead by J. Croca (http://cfcul.fc.ul.pt/equipa/jcroca.php) an awarded Physicist (Galileo-Santilli Prize 2008). The same article in Portuguese was deleted buy an English reviewer and I thought that it was a language issue. You said that this article was an obvious invention. Well, I am not sure what do you mean by invention. Maybe you are right, since this concept didn't exist before our work. However, we would like to see it labelled as a discovery rather that invention. Anyway, please, check this up, with a little more time, and I am sure that you will find that this is a real article, resulting from a scientific research process. My contact is [email protected] .Thank you so much for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricsal2000 (talkcontribs) 17:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)There does appear to be a couple of sources by that Croca fellow, but only by him. Doesn't meet the WP:GNG, as far as I can tell. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It may be "real", but we need to wait until reliable sources, independent of the publisher of Croca's articles, report on this concept. See WP:V and WP:NOR. This is the cause of another problem with the article: it is not written in a neutral fashion, but in a tone which accepts the concept as true and important, and argues why it is accurate. That's not appropriate here, see WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yassin Albarri[edit]

I'm seriously reaching a point of anger! Please stop deleting my work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yazza29 (talkcontribs) 02:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're fourteen years old and you are using Wikipedia to promote yourself and your organization. We only have articles on people who have already been covered by reliable, independent sources, see WP:V, and we discourage people from writing about or promoting themselves on Wikipedia, see WP:SPAM and WP:COI. We've asked *you* several times to stop writing about yourself. I'm asking once again. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of Shine Entertainment Media[edit]

I'm not sure why you keep deleting the Shine Entertainment Media page. I know I have advertised in the past but I have deleted the insertions of the company name on client pages and made the company page extremely neutral. Now it was deleted under the guise that it wasn't relevant enough, which I don't understand since there is a pretty extensive client list. Please let me know how I can make the page stay on Wikipedia. Lcrocha (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Kind regards, Lucas[reply]

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Bent Paddle Brewing Company[edit]

Regarding your request for deletion of Bent Paddle Brewing Company, the article cites a number of quality sources such as newspapers and magazines (both local and more regional). The sources also give the company fairly substantial treatment and several reference other articles from the same publication regarding the company. Could you let me know more specifically what your grievance or concern is (number of sources, quality of sources, audience, etc.)? Nsteffel (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Dario Brignole[edit]

Hello, I wrote to you about Shine and it seems like you completely ignored me. I was unaware that the links were considered spam and have already stopped doing that, I was just doing as I was told my boss. I would like to know why Dario is not notable, given the links I provided and extensive client list on the website and Shine page (which you deleted). I am willing to work on the pages so they can stay on Wikipedia. Shine is not a PR Agency, but rather a marketing agency. I know for a fact there are companies that hire PR agencies so they can be on Wikipedia (I spoke to someone offering me that service today), so I don't understand why the fact that I am an intern of the company matters given I have kept a neutral point of view in my articles. I would really appreciate a reply from you. Best regards, Lcrocha (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The fact that Shine has notable clients doesn't make it, or its president, notable. There needs to be independent coverage that shows that the article subject is notable (otherwise, Kanye West's janitor would have a page). The fact that we keep having these arguments is a perfect illustration of why you should not be editing articles where you and your employer have a business interest in presenting them in a positive light, see WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I provided several external links and references to CNN interviews and articles with Dario (I don't think Kanye's janitor has those). Indeed, I have an interest that Shine is represented in a positive light, but what's the difference between me, an unpaid intern, updating the page, and paying a PR firm to do it? The same way I might have that interest (which I am able to contain), anyone paying a PR firm thousands of dollars will want their company seen in a positive light. Companies like William Morris Endeavor and IMG have in-house PR teams who update their Wikipedia pages, so I am really struggling to understand why we can't have ours. I know they are much bigger companies and may have had more independent coverage, but there is no reason why a smaller company with smaller (but still existing) media presence can be on this list. Again, I am willing to work with you if you find my articles biased. Kind regards Lcrocha (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just salt that page? It's been repeatedly created and recreated. Thanks. Whispering 20:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have deleted company page which is rapidly growing across India. I would like to ask how is this work. If one of competitor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LocalOye.com can create simple article on wikipedia about their company then why I can't? As you can see our page is similar to localoye but I have changed the content which is original. The format is same. I want to have this answer. Please let me know.

Reliable sources for Lundons Bridge[edit]

I have other sources like http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/12/paris-jackson-lands-debut-movie-role/

or

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2071937/Michael-Jacksons-daughter-Paris-set-star-film.html

or

http://www.ellentv.com/2011/12/15/find-out-more-about-lundons-bridge-and-the-three-keys/

that show that Lundons Bridge is a real movie. Would these count as reliable sources and if not, then what counts? could I please have my article back?

  • These sources are all from 2011, three years ago. Where is this movie now? This is why we don't have articles on many things that are merely planned, see WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lundons Bridge updated source[edit]

The official website for Londons Bridge which is already a novel has finished casting for roles and are now filming the last few scenes needed.

source - http://www.lundons.com/news/

Does this count as recent? if not, what does? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lundons Bridge and The Three Keys (talkcontribs) 12:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does this count?[edit]

http://www.amazon.com/Lundons-Bridge-Three-Dennis-Christen-ebook/dp/B006LSCMMO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1401569948&sr=8-1&keywords=lundons+bridge+and+the+three+keys

You can literally purchase the book for sites like amazon. Does this not prove that Lundons bridge is a legit thing?

  • No, "it exists" is not the same as "it is notable because it has been covered by reliable independent sources." I've asked you more than once to read WP:V. If you can't do that, there's not much point in your continuing to ask me questions. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Once the movie is out[edit]

Once the movie has been played in the cinema and released on dvd, could I then have my article back?