User talk:NatalieF25

Adding general links[edit]

The content you are adding is fine, but please don't add general links to the external links section. If a site has a page specific to the topic, that's fine, but we don't need a general report on midwifery on every page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to above, please stop adding the external link to midwife information on general country pages. While such links may be appropriate for the articles about Health in X they are not suitable for general country articles. In addition, it is probably WP:UNDUE to add such a large amount of information about this topic into country articles, consider expanding again in the relevant Health articles. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, cheers for the advice.NatalieF25(talk)13:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I may suggest something, don't bother to write about the actual study when adding to country articles. Just the statistics relating to the country sourced to the study would be much better for the articles. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The midwifery content of the Health in Bhutan article is more than sufficient. Please stop adding external links on midwifery to that article. Please also refrain from adding or making inconsistent citation markup within articles. Thank you. JFHJr (㊟) 17:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's sufficient, I added it. I don't understand what you mean by inconsistent citation markup..? (NatalieF25 (talk) 12:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I know you inserted it. I corrected your formatting then, too. Here, you put external links into the main text, added the SAME bare link below, without tags, and further changed citation markup. In doing so, you also reformatted the citation using inappropriate fields ("date=Accessed August 2011") and changed the cite from the report itself to a page without the information. External links don't belong in text, and when you add to pages, you should conform to the way the page is already written if there is a scheme. JFHJr (㊟) 18:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, NatalieF25, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. — Amakuru (talk) 13:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, NatalieF25. You have new messages at Chipmunkdavis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]