User talk:NSX2015

September 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Polestar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize i'm about to ad some cite some sources. NSX2015 (talk) 04:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it. TylerBurden (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hi NSX, I see that you are adding sources now, that's excellent. I will have to point you to Template:Infobox automobile for some pointers on what belongs in the various fields. We generally do not include prototypes and show cars, just closely related production cars in the Related field. AKA is for rebadges, usually for other markets or if a car changed names during the production span. In general, the infobox is not an exhaustive list of everything relating to a car.

Also, please try to read sources critically as well. This one, for instance, is just a minimal rewrite of the WP article itself and is therefore not a particularly good source. See WP:RS and WP:CIRCULAR. Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 03:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll try to use more reliable sources. NSX2015 (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luxury car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weltmeister. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Ninenine99 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ninenine99. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Not user NineNine99 NSX2015 (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #65368[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]