User talk:Mudkiller93

February 2019

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Electric Ladyland, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 00:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Oh

Oh sorry man I didn’t think about that Mudkiller93 (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome Mudkiller93!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,033,387 registered editors!

Hello, Mudkiller93. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia A Primer for Newcomers Introduction to Wikipedia Wikipedia Training Modules Simplified Manual of Style Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 01:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

February 2019

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The House at Pooneil Corners, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Born to Be Wild. —C.Fred (talk) 23:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I want unblocked

Can I please be unblocked. I’ll make a sammiches for you! Mudkiller93 (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Please follow the directions at WP:GAB in making an unblock request—and make sure the request includes the necessary content. —C.Fred (talk) 00:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Can I be unblocked?

I have no choice in being unblocked Mudkiller93 (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Unblock me Mudkiller93 (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please follow the guide to appealing blocks and submit a properly formatted and complete request. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Can you unblock me?

I don’t know why I was blocked Mudkiller93 (talk) 12:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)