User talk:Ms Lito

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Addition of pictures[edit]

Please assist in adding pictures that relate to the Phathisi (Bakwena Traditional Dance)

Hello[edit]

This is my new talk page Ms Lito (talk) 01:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Palesa Molefe moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Palesa Molefe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 08:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Palesa Molefe[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ms Lito. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palesa Molefe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Palesa Molefe[edit]

Hello, Ms Lito. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palesa Molefe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Climate Change in Botswana[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Anthere (talk) 02:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article: Mpho Sebina[edit]

Hi @Ms Lito.

Your article Mpho Sebina cites no sources. Every fact and statement in your article needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources. This is so anyone can verify that the statements in your article are accurate and to ensure that your topic is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia.

It might be worth reading Wikipedia:Your first article which gives you the dos and don'ts of creating an article, plus the Wikipedia:Citing sources guide that explains how to cite sources.

The easiest way to fix your article is to find sources that cover Mpho Sebina in detail, and then summarise them in your own words. That should make up the content of your article draft. Note that the sources must be:

- Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources that are published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of birth), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis or interpretation.
- Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website.
- Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information or analysis about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.
- From multiple places: You should find at least three separate reliable, independent, secondary sources that discuss your subject.
- Not original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.

Remember that your article should be written from a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

If you cannot find multiple, reliable, and independent sources then I am afraid that Mpho Sebina would not meet the Wikipedia:Notability (music) criteria at this time and therefore cannot have a Wikipedia article. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia: not an advertising platform, directory, or a way to promote a subject.

Finally, please note that if you are connected in any way to Mpho Sebina then you must declare your Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here: Get help at the Teahouse

Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 13:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mpho Sebina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 01:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day.
Please atleast move it to draft space so I can continue working on it until it is in a proper standard. I am still working on improving it. Kind Regards Ms Lito (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good day.
I just realized it has already been deleted, its okay.
Regards Ms Lito (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]