User talk:Mrmanhattanproject

FYI[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romeo Carey, connected to Beverly Hills High School. -Will Beback 07:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VandalProof Registration[edit]

Thanks for your interest in VandalProof; however, I'm afraid I can't approve you to use this tool quite yet. As VP has the potential to do serious harm to Wikipedia when used by inexperienced Wikipedians, we've currently set in place a guideline requiring 250 mainspace edits for approval, although that guideline is subject to be waived in special circumstances. I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but please keep up the good work! If you continue to edit and gain experience and knowledge about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, there should be no problem adding you to the approved list (in say 1-2 weeks), so please reapply when you feel you have gained sufficient knowledge and experience with Wikipedia. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 01:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marsh[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I've just restored the above warning from the page's history. Please do not remove warnings from your talk page without properly archiving them, as doing so is currently not prohibited. These messages help others (such as myself) understand a user's previous involvements, disputes, and problems, and they should not be removed unless you can gain the permission of the user who placed the warning to do so (or if the warning was issued in bad faith). Your periodic talk page blanking may also be considered highly inappropriate, though allowed, as it appears to be an attempt to conceal a user's history. You may want to check out Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 02:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul International School[edit]

Hi Mrmanhattanproject, please see Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy. Only administrators can semi-protect a page. Also, it is not usually done when there are a limited number of vandals who can be warned and blocked individually. Regards, Accurizer 20:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beverly Hills High School[edit]

Hi, this is in response to the question you left on my talk page. I think the answer depends on whether or not the on-line newspaper is already notable. Of course, this is fairly subjective and since I have no connection to the school or its community, it is difficult for me to ascertain. In general terms, if the newspaper constitutes a ranting by a handful of students and they are simply trying to gain notoriety by having it mentioned in Wikipedia, then it should not be included. But, if the newspaper has a large following and it already notable, it should be included. As to where it should be addressed, if at all, I think it makes sense to place it in the "News services" section. Alternatively, if the newspaper is largely a criticism of the school, it could be mentioned in a new section, "Criticisms". However, since it is not an official publication, it certainly should not be mentioned in the infobox, as one editor tried to do (which I reverted). I hope this is helpful. Regards, Accurizer 14:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Career Day 065 16 06 070.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Career Day 065 16 06 070.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Test templates and WP:AIV[edit]

Please don't list an editor on WP:AIV unless they have a long history of vandalism or have recently received test3 and/or test4 templates. Thanks. JoshuaZ 02:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help again with Beverly Hills High School[edit]

If you have a chance, please help out again. Karmak is on the loose again. Thanks. Moncrief 21:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Beverly Hills High School[edit]

Your recent edit to Beverly Hills High School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Azera.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Azera.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 17:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Official_souvenir.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Official_souvenir.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 11:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sis auditorium.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sis auditorium.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]