User talk:Mrinsanity

Speedy deletion of Matthew rechnitzer[edit]

A tag has been placed on Matthew rechnitzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Matthew rechnitzer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Arakunem^Talk 00:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Milan Lučić. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LittleOldMe (talk) 00:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Exosome complex, you will be blocked from editing. Trafford09 (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I accept that I have wronged, and that the article edited was changed during a party under peer pressure from several friends, and I can assure you that only real articles will be written by me in the future. Thanks much.}}

Your block has already expired. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of David Rechnitzer[edit]

A tag has been placed on David Rechnitzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Logan | Talk 20:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail [email protected]. I'm afraid this account only seems to be used for vandalism so I've blocked it. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]