User talk:Mrholybrain/Archive-Nov2007
Hi, please explain how my changes are defamatory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.86.228 (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- You said that James Thomson was not a sustainable architect, without sourcing it. Please read Wikipedia:No original research. mrholybrain's talk 17:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please re-read my statement in context of sustainable architecture and the inference is self-evident. Sustainable Architecture is a defined term, and the architect in question's work doesn't fall into that category. Therefore he is not a sustainable architect. I DO NOT have to source this statement, and you would not ask for a source for a statement such as this if you had cared to look through my edits.
- Being unsustainable is a crime in architectural circles, and unsustainable architects must be clearly marked as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.170.151 (talk) 20:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- If you wish to say that James Thomson is unsustainable, you need to provide evidence for that. I have looked through your edits, and they have been mostly vandalism. mrholybrain's talk 22:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
<references /> section on Talk page[edit]
Just so you know, bare URLs will be automatically linked. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117975542.html?categoryid=14&cs=1 Talk pages don't normally need a cite-<references /> structure. / edg ☺ ☭ 06:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)