User talk:Mrcwallace

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mick Molloy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Waggers 11:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tough Love with Mick Molloy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Waggers 11:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robyn Butler

A tag has been placed on Robyn Butler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Robyn Butler. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material. By the way, thanks for the compliment you left on my talk page. Waggers 12:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am I following you?

No, but I am using a tool that highlights possible vandalism. It automatically highlights edits from users that I've previously reverted, so I'll see what you're up to, as well as the other users I've been keeping an eye on today. Right now it's lunchtime here in the UK so you must be staying up late in Oz. May I suggest that you stop mucking around with Wikipedia and get some sleep? Waggers 12:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noah the Rover

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Noah the Rover, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Noah the Rover. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Noah the Rover

I've nominated the article Noah the Rover for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Noah the Rover satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah the Rover. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Noah the Rover during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]