User talk:Mostadorthsander

August 2013

Hello, I'm Dawnseeker2000. An edit that you recently made to Colonization of the Moon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 01:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Colonization of the Moon, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balsam wood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Balsam wood, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Balsam. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Balsam, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 20:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Balsam wood. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aerospeed (Talk) 21:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balsam wood

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Balsam wood, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aerospeed (Talk) 21:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balsam wood

Hello Mostadorthsander,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Balsam wood for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SantiLak (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Balsam (disambiguation) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Aerospeed (Talk) 23:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Param Mudgal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Teaching method because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Param Mudgal (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teaching method. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Teaching method was changed by Mostadorthsander (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900144 on 2014-09-10T19:18:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

growing wikipedia

adding all knowledges to Wikipedia would be awesome...instead of undoing trying sorting and categorizing...

general observations

it appears some chaotic spirit is changing some names and words and places

visual written lores

it appears some robotics hackers are attempting to spoil the Wikipedia encyclopedia and lack admiration and respect for the visual written and imaged lores and knowledges...the flow energies of the robotic programs should be taken to another more appropriate websites...

Correct. Your edits to Wikipedia so far are contrary to the policies, processes, and methods that you agreed to when you arrived. Please take such stuff elsewhere the panda ₯’ 21:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]