User talk:MontanaInfo

This is MontanaInfo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terry Vermeire has been accepted[edit]

Terry Vermeire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MontanaInfo! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Curbon7 (talk) 04:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Mullen moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jesse Mullen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Declared COI, needs to be submitted for review. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, MontanaInfo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Mullen Newspaper Company, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jesse Mullen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jesse Mullen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. the article is updated. MontanaInfo (talk) 05:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mullen (COI review) (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jesse Mullen, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mullen (COI review) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MontanaInfo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mullen (October 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please fix your references. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References fixed. Any content posted using an unreliable reference was removed from the article, or linked to a reliable source. MontanaInfo (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mullen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Those items deleted from article.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MontanaInfo (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mullen (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent significant coverage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mullen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a number I need to hit for "independent" coverage? So far, I have the Smithsonian, National Newspaper Association, Editor & Publisher Magazine, The Montana Standard, The Missoulian, and The Helena Independent Record. That's six from companies not associated with Mullen. Would the other sources still be accepted as adequate links for another person? They are legitimate legal publishing newspapers of public record, some in existence for more than 100 years. MontanaInfo (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jesse Mullen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jesse Mullen. Thanks! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mullen has been accepted[edit]

Jesse Mullen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Jesse Mullen, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:MontanaInfo, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MontanaInfo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You still have not responded to this COI notice sent by User:GPL93, and you appear to be a single-purpose editor. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]