User talk:Mkaus1071

July 2022

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Jingiby (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. I will try to obey the rules. I have created my proposed page for Wikipedia in Sandbox. Please have a look.

Kind regards, Mkaus1071 Mkaus1071 (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

My created page in Sandbox is not a modification of the topic Thessaloniki which already exist. It has a different name Thessaloniki (Solun). It has contents from the history of the Macedonian people who suffered because of the division of Macedonia as it was before the Balkan Wars in 1912-13 and then the First World War and the Second World War. The contents of this new page is relevant and is completely different from the contents in Thessaloniki, which contains the Greek viewpoint and their version of the history of Macedonia. We, Macedonian people have been trampled upon by Greeks and Bulgarians for such a long time, and before World War 2, by Serbians also. Before the First World War, Macedonian people was oppressed by Ottoman Turks for 550 years. So, just be aware of that and show some respect for Macedonia and its people.

Kind regards, Mkaus107 Mkaus1071 (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Long time ago, in the beginning and the middle of the 20th Century, attrocities were committed to such extent that none of the 1.2 - 1.5 million Macedonians in what is now northern Greece remained there. The genocide is contunuing today with the Greek and Bulgarian denial of the Macedonian nation, language and culture. The Macedonians were majority back then. Your remarks are humiliating for the Macedonian (now minority), and if you don't know the history, I'll forgive you. But, since you say you know the history, then I have to be firm in telling you the truth and insist on it.

Thanks! Mkaus1071 (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The greek mythology is full of gods - warriors, even to this day reflected in the Orthodox faith.

Who is this saibt - warrior?

https :// maps. app. bgoo. gl/ g6T4KDTvtWAd2DTC9

What does it mean, all this? When you look at this saint, with his great sword and he is looking at you like that, it looks as if he wants to cut your head off, isn't it? But, Christian faith is about brotherly love. "Love your beighbour as yourself", said Jesus. But, no, in Greece it means the opposite: "Hate your neighbour, take his land and drive him away. If he doesn't want to go - kill him! And this us what the Greeks did to the Macedonian Slavs, basucally.

And we are now the insugnificant minority. Yes, we are! But, this doesn't mean that the Greeks who did that, that they will not pay for what they did. Mkaus1071 (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)