User talk:Mister Mtzplk

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mister Mtzplk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 03:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Debito Arudou may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

He received his Ph.D. from Meiji Gakuin University in International Studies in April 2014.<ref>"[http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2014/06/04/issues/humanize-dry-debate-immigration/". ''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Academic Credentials[edit]

Hi. See WP:CREDENTIALS for more information on why some of your recent edits were reverted. Thanks, Oddexit (talk) 04:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recently receiving his doctorate in International Studies can certainly be added in the body of the article, however. Although I'm not sure where it should go. Oddexit (talk) 04:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mister Mtzplk, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mister Mtzplk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Debito.org[edit]

Please review WP:SELFPUB before sourcing third-party information to Arudou's personal website. It's not allowed. If the quote or information can be found in a reliably sourced publication like a newspaper or an academic journal, then it might belong on Wikipedia. But if it only comes from his website, it has to be removed. I'm just letting you know in case you can find it outside of his website. Oddexit (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I dont want to get into an edit war here, but this is a primary-source document that happens to be on Arudo's site. There are many other links to Arudo's site, dont understand why this is only one you seem to object to. I am trying to assume good faith in your edits, but I see before you cut any "wordy" pro-Arudo quote but don't trim critics. It doesn't matter where the letter is archived, it matters that it exists and that it talks about Arudo's protest. You would seem to cut other pro-Arudu stuff if it doesn't mention him even if it was the result of his work. This time you cant, since it is addressed to him, so you are trying to delete only because it's archived on Debito.org. Let's take this one to mediation to avoid edit war.Mister Mtzplk (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An email by a third-party posted on Arudou's website is not a reliable source. Had it been published in a newspaper, academic journal, or book (that wasn't self-published) discussing Arudou, then it would have been located in a reliable source and certainly up for discussion provided that it didn't violate undue weight. You also should read WP:SELFPUB because it's possible that you don't understand when it's okay to use Arudou's website and when it's not. It has nothing to do with "positive" or "negative" comments about Arudou. Information about Arudou himself posted by Arudou that does not discuss a third party (an email from Nishi Ward is a third party) is usually allowed. It is NEVER allowed in a WP:BLP -- something you should also read. As for the quote, I just cut a few words because they didn't add anything. I think you're taking this a little too personal. I appreciate your contributions, but you're new and it's possible that you haven't read these things yet. I also assume good faith. Oddexit (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Debito Arudou discretionary sanctions[edit]

Hello Mister Mtzplk. This is just to let you know that Debito Arudou, an article you have recently edited, is under discretionary sanctions. I've included some boilerplate text about what discretionary sanctions are below. Let me know if you have any questions about it. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 04:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

November 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 06:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]