User talk:Mikesmash

Copyright problem: Joe Szwaja

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Joe Szwaja, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.ourcampaigns.com/CandidateDetail.html?CandidateID=1904, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Joe Szwaja and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Joe Szwaja with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Joe Szwaja.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Joe Szwaja/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Joe Szwaja saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 201.240.30.26 13:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is not a copyright of ourcampaigns.com, but of the subject's campaign itself. The website, ourcampaigns is using it from the Szwaja presskit just as wikipedia is. It's a promotional photo and it's been linked to in the picture's information. Mikesmash 08:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Primary results updates

You may want to consider waiting until the Washington primary results are certified before updating them. The update you just made ~~is already~~ will shortly be out of date because the SoS website is being updated ~~constantly~~ frequently as tallies from the absentee ballots come in. 100% of precincts only means the numbers from the polling stations are done and does not include absentee. Just a thought, but if you want to continue with the updates, more power to you. --Bobblehead 19:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bottom_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottom_logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GreenPartylogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:GreenPartylogo.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Durin 13:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal

Yes, I did remove them. These images exist on Wikipedia under terms of fair use. Our fair use policy at Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #8 states "The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." The manner in which the logos were being used was purely decorative. With the images removed, the same information was conveyed...which party the various candidates belong to. Thus, the images do not contribute significantly to the article and thus fail the above quoted policy for that use. That fair use logos are used on other political entries in violation of Wikipedia policy does not mean we can violate policy in all articles. In time, the violations will be removed either by myself or other editors. If you have any questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 18:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

I've submitted the article for Robin Adair, an article that you created, for deletion. Please go to its deletion discussion to voice your opinion on the matter.--Bobblehead 19:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Gardner

I think retcon is a better word, as it wasn't taken away. If you are unclear as to the definition, I had provided you with a link to see the entry regarding the article.Arcayne 04:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retcon means that the ring was taken out of continuity. It hasn't been. -- mikesmash

Mike, we know that it is nearly impossible to destroy a power ring. But if you say it was destroyed (a fact that I am unaware of), perhaps you could cite a verifiable reference that it was destroyed. I will leave the statement alone for a bit, but you really need to tag a citation to that statement, or cannot stay.Arcayne 05:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I got it for you.Arcayne 05:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MrTerrificHolt1.jpg

This doesn't appear to be a cover, because it's lacking the usual things a cover would have like the name of the publication. More likely it's a promotional pic you found on a website somewhere. If so, you need to change the licensing and indicate which website it came from. It's a great image, and I want to use it as the main pic, but can't without the full and correct info. CovenantD 12:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grayvage Hulk

The term "Grayvage Hulk" gets a grand total of 6 Google hits. Only 6. And yet you keep reinserting that material. Pushing a term like that is what constitutes original research. Because it is not a common phrase at all, trying to pro mote it is the OR. Doczilla 08:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GRAVAGE, not Grayvage. And it gets 648 hits and is repeated by THE CURRENT Hulk writer with citation. That's two more citations than any other incarnation listed on the entry now.

I get 574 Google hits for it, but either way, you're right. That's more than 6. It's still pretty small compared to the number of hits most things get, though.

You do realize you're not supposed to revert a page more than 3 times within 24 hours, don't you? In the last few hours, you've reverted the Hulk page 5 times to a version you posted a couple of days ago -- when YOU had changed the spelling from Gravage to Grayvage, by the way. (And don't deny that the user at 24.16.211.40 is you. You repeatedly edit the same articles and in the same order in your edit history.) Doczilla 08:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was me, yes. And it wasn't to evade any rules -- which I was unaware of. This isn't a career to most of us. But the incarnation is prominent and has appeared continually in the series for over two years now. Not to mention its' previous appearances. The Devil Hulk has a section, yet he appeared in a video game and in only a single writer's run on the character. I really do not care what you label the section, but the incarnation deserves to be included on the page and I provided citations for it, including a quote by the series' current writer.

If it wasn't to evade any rules, the obvious question is: Then why did you wait until after your 3rd revision before logging in as Mikesmash? (I don't really care. I'm just pointing out how that looks.) Doczilla 08:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simple answer? Because I was lazy and wasn't logged in automatically. I didn't even KNOW there was such a rule. Fiddling with these entries is a hobby, not the serious pursuit that so many on here treat it like. And I was pissed that when it was first reverted, the patronizing description of "nonsense". Aside from the objections to the name, I haven't yet heard a rational motivation for taking a section about this Hulk incarnation down.

Fair use rationale for Image:Aaronsign.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aaronsign.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is either no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use, or else the rationale given is not valid. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:JoeSzwaja1a.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:JoeSzwaja1a.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:JoeSzwaja1a.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:JoeSzwaja1a.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bruce_Guthrie.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce_Guthrie.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 16:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Joe_Szwaja.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Joe_Szwaja.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 04:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Joe Szwaja. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tiptoety 06:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szwaja Picture

Hey - it looks like the picture you just uploaded will just be automatically deleted again in a few days - I don't know much about how fair use for pictures work, but you might want to talk to someone who does to see what you need to do to get that picture to stay there. Alternately, you could upload a picture you've taken, if you have one. Surfeited 06:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, my understanding of fair use guidelines is foggy at best. I would start, however, by editing the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Szwaja.jpg as detailed in the licensing section (you dispute the tag), and then putting what you said to me in the talk section. You may also want to write to editors such as Quadell, who know much much more about wikipedia's rule for picture use. Also, you should put a "hangon tag" to the Szwaja article if you don't want it to be deleted - without any dispute, an administrator will have no reason not to delete. Good luck! Surfeited 06:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Szwaja‎

Just FYI, that 201 IP address person had put that article up for prod. I took it off. See Joe Szwaja‎ talk. • Lawrence Cohen 13:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Szwaja

Childzy, can I get a third opinion on an editing dispute I'm having with another user on both Jean Godden and Joe Szwaja? We're certainly both partisan and I'd like more opinions and involvement of people who don't care about this election. Mikesmash 04:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure whats the dispute about? --Childzy ¤ Talk 09:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've had a pretty good look at what has been going on. It seems this user [3] is taking issue with some of the things that arent in the article? Saying that some important things are missing. Well i have read the article and sources a bit and the article in no way what so ever fails WP:LIBEL. Everything that is in the article is well sourced and it seems "User:Landsfarthereast" is using the talk pages of article to tell you to do things to the article, dont feel obligied to listen to the guy. Just tell him WP:SOFIXIT, there is nothing stopping the user from editing the page himself. A good thing to remember is not to get stessed, you are a valuable wikipedia, you are getting things done. I left once because it got stressful. Also wikipedia is not cited as being purely factual so if "User:Landsfarthereast" has an issue the tell him/her to read [4] which explains things. If you need any more help with this edit dispute just let me know, i've just tried to outline the basics here. Hope i've been of help --Childzy ¤ Talk 09:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hulk (comics)

We need your help. The persistent anon IP who keeps reinserting fancruft edits that a consensus of editors has been removing. I don't want to risk an edit war, so I'm asking other recent article editors to come take a look at weigh in. Thanks. --Tenebrae 18:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Not enough of these are given out to people who should get them, great work on the article Jean Godden Childzy ¤ Talk 10:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

FYI. • Lawrence Cohen 22:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Szwaja cleanup

Just another FYI; I've basically finished a heavy-duty clean up on Joe Szwaja now. Take a gander. • Lawrence Cohen 17:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Szwaja.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Szwaja.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion I7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Szwaja.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. • Lawrence Cohen 22:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szwaja image

Just a note, the article is up for GA, and I didn't realize/remember that was a fair use image. It isn't valid for that article, so it has to go. Sorry... Byt the way, lots of work coming up on the article this week for the GA review. • Lawrence Cohen 22:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MrTerrific fight.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MrTerrific fight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MrTerrificHolt1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MrTerrificHolt1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mrterrificjlu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrterrificjlu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Terrific-atheist.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Terrific-atheist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

greetings from a reporter

Hello. My name is Mary and I'm a newspaper reporter working on an article about Wikipedia. Are you available to do an interview? If you could let me know by email ([email protected]) I'd really appreciate it. Thanks for your time, MaryMarynega (talk) 01:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mike_McGavick_2_300dpi.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike_McGavick_2_300dpi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 03:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Szwaja

The article Joe Szwaja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no recent public office holding, minor political figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bevinbell 04:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe_Szwaja

An article that you have been involved in editing, Joe_Szwaja, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe_Szwaja. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bevinbell 18:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]