User talk:Miguelfinney

Welcome!

Hello, Miguelfinney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits may have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy.

Specially WP:BLP - it must have a WP:RS other than the authors own web page or whatever.

Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 00:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Although Violette L. Meier has not have major coverage outside of local newspapers, she has had many write-ups by various bloggers. She is well respected in her community and is an up and coming writer.[reply]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Possible future fame has no effect on present notability. Wikipedia articles are about presently notable subjects only. Articles about people, particularly living persons must meet notability criteria in order to be considered worthy of inclusion. This means they will have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable third-party sources. Blogs are generally considered unreliable as they lack the established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Please review WP:NEXTBIGTHING. --Drm310 (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miguelfinney, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Miguelfinney! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Violette L. Meier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Violette L. Meier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 22:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]