Jump to content

User talk:MickFinn2011

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Gérard Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha Quadrant talk 19:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Gérard Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Apprentice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you recently removed some content from John Cartwright (footballer) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, GiantSnowman 16:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at John Cartwright (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Wilkinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Napier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gérard Jones for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gérard Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gérard Jones (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:08, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ian Burchnall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Well-written but non-notable article - fails WP:GNG as not enough independent, reliable sources cover this individual in significant detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sam Wilkinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Well-written but non-notable article - fails WP:GNG as not enough independent, reliable sources cover this individual in significant detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roger Wilkinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Well-written but non-notable article - fails WP:GNG as not enough independent, reliable sources cover this individual in significant detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]