User talk:Michaeleconomy

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the criterion which applies is WP:MADEUP. Without verifiable major third-party sources, the content isn't eligible. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- PS: The content falls under WP:WEB as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my mistake and I may very well have deserved the friendly "trout slap" I got from another user. I seem to have missed the print reference and I mistakenly thought the game was web content and not printed. I'll go ahead and restore it. PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Herbert Simon (business)[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Herbert Simon (business). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Herbert Simon (real estate). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Herbert Simon (real estate) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That page wasn't linked from the pacers, or from kirkus reviews, or from the other herbert simon, so I added it, thanks for pointing out the error Michaeleconomy (talk) 20:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armorica (game) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorica (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorica (game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've responded on the deletion thread. Michaeleconomy (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]