User talk:Mia Watson

Welcome

Hello, Mia Watson, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of John Layke

Hello Mia Watson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Layke for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Jbh ^Talk 21:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Layke

Hi, I'm Jbhunley. Mia Watson, thanks for creating John Layke!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article reads like a resume. A laundry list of certifications and patients simply is not of encyclopedic value.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Jbh ^Talk 21:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I have seen your edits but I think the main links are removed which were actually more reliable and shows notability. I am adding them again in a different non-promotional way as suggested by you. Mia Watson (talk) 06:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about John Layke

Hello, Mia Watson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether John Layke should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Layke .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Jbh ^Talk 22:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erik Gatenholm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Gatenholm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Gatenholm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KJP1 (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just saw hat happened to the article as I was travelling, that was crazy someone ruined my good article. Anyway, thanks for informing me. I guess I should avoid creating articles lol. Mia Watson (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mia Watson/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Mia Watson/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mia Watson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is completely unfair, if I am trying to something I am blamed of a useless reason. I read all notability guidelines and I am just trying to neutrally judge like others. I have seen everyone is deleting the pages without any solid reasons and proofs, some users are just copy pasting same comments everywhere which is extremely heart wrenching and they are sabotaging the Wikipedia existence. He could have notified me but blocked me immediately. Mia Watson (talk) 13:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seams that you are only interested in leaving mining-less, non-policy-based comments on WP:AfD pages. That is disruptive and does not help to build an encyclopedia. You have to convince us that you will change behavior if unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mia Watson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well I tried to read comment as per policies but I'll avoid AFds if I did I'll only do policy based comments. So, please unblock me. And guide the blockers to at least give a warning or to tell the user, so they can understand. I'll try my best now not to participate and will do things that are policy based. Thanks Mia Watson (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you'll avoid AfDs, does not convince me you will take responsibility for your actions, and does not convince me it is a good idea to unblock you at this time. Yamla (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In your n ext unblock request, please explain what you will do if unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:42, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]