User talk:Mcepitome

Welcome!

Hello, Mcepitome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Have A Nice Day 08:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Blue Star Camps[edit]

Hi, because you began this article you may want to see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Star Camps (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for adminship[edit]

Hello. I noticed your recently-posted request for adminship, and thought I should leave a note about it here.

Adminship, while technically "no big deal", is something that RfA !voters like to give only when they believe that the candidate will not misuse the tools - that is, if they trust them. Unfortunately, this means that candidates need an extensive history here in order to succeed in their request, particularly since many users hold them to standards of their own: it's generally accepted that a minimum of a few months' active participation, and at least a thousand or so edits are necessary to prove that they know their way around and can be trusted.

As a result, it's very unlikely that your request will be successful this time around, since you have only 178 edits at the moment. You can withdraw the request by simply saying that you'd like to below your self-introduction, and it will be removed from the page without prejudice. I'd suggest doing so, since people will inevitable pile on in opposition - an experience that can be soul-destroying at times.

From looking through a few of your contributions, you do appear to be a good editor, and I'd like to see more of you around. You might find it useful to request an editor review, which will provide a few tips on how to expand your experience in such a way that people will be happy to support you. If you'd like to re-apply for adminship, feel free to do so in about three months' time and make sure to edit regularly in the meantime - withdrawn and unsuccessful RfA bear no prejudice, and you won't be judged unfairly in any future request.

Good luck in the future, and I hope to see you sticking around. Happy editing! :) Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 01:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yorkshire hip hop[edit]

I've reverted your redirect - I don't think this is the right procedure, it might have been better to have merged with British hip hop. It would be useful to have your comments on the talk page of Yorkshire hip hop in any case. Please don't reply to me personally, let's move this discussion to the talk page of Yorkshire hip hop. Regards. Escaper7 11:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cwcs logo mid.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cwcs logo mid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cwcs logo mid.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cwcs logo mid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of 679 (number)[edit]

A tag has been placed on 679 (number) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jeodesic 12:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rising Son[edit]

An editor has nominated Rising Son, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rising Son and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pacewon[edit]

The article Pacewon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 03:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Spit kingdom" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spit kingdom and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#Spit kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Juiceslf (rapper)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juiceslf (rapper), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]