User talk:Max Li Hao

Max Li Hao, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Max Li Hao! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Astro (television), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.- Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Max Li Hao. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Astro (television), you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you.- Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Astro (television). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Raja Lawak Astro. - Arjayay (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Astro (television). - Arjayay (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL

With regard to this edit; please read the guideline linked in this section title. I have been blocking a serial sock puppeteer that has been insisting on adding "upcoming" events. I do not think you are the same editor, but I would caution you against executing such edits against consensus. Tiderolls 15:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions - yet again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Astro (television). - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at TVB Jade. - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Important

Why are you continuing to list future events, especially without consensus or reliable sourcing, after repeated instruction that this practice contravenes Wikipedia guidelines? If you continue to do so you are jeopardizing your editing privilege. Tiderolls 14:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Max Li Hao, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Mediacorp has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Tide rolls ‎. DMacks (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I will not disruptive editing and vandalism editing anymore.}}. Tiderolls 13:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Max Li Hao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked bercause i disruptive editing a new page, sock puppet of Devil Dark Vader and my original account Lowlihao has been revoking talk page access that cause me cannot editing my original talk page when i want to create a new page such as TVB HD Jade, TVB J5, TVB iNews, TVB Classic, TVB Xing He, TVB Entertainment News, TVB Variety, TVB First, ViuTV, ATV Classic, RTHK 31, RTHK 32 and many-many pages than i want to create it. After i was unblock, i going to create a new page immediately.

Decline reason:

We know why you were blocked. What you need to do is stop creating new accounts contrary to policy. At this point WP:STANDARD OFFER is your best option. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request For Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Max Li Hao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked bercause i disruptive editing a new page, block evasion when i was create a new account, sock puppet of User:Devil Dark Vader with my original account is User:Lowlihao my alternative account is User:Mikey Low Li Hao, User:Mr. Low Li Hao, User: JJ Saga 12345, User:Mighty Joker Revenge Game, User:Revenge Of The Ghost, User:Revenge Of The Ghost 002 and my original account has been revoking talk page access that cause me cannot editing my original talk page. After my original account and my alternative account was unblock, i was going to to create a new page such as TVB HD Jade, TVB J5, TVB iNews, TVB Classic, TVB Xing He, TVB Entertainment News, TVB Variety, TVB First, ViuTV, ATV Classic, RTHK 31, RTHK 32 and many-many pages than i want to create a new page it immediately.

Decline reason:

So this is a sockpuppet account, and you lost your ability to edit your User talk:Lowlihao talk page (and both accounts are tagged as socks of User:Devil Dark Vader) because you were using it to make death threats! And you expect to be unblocked? I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. If you think you will ever have a chance of being unblocked, then you will need to contact WP:UTRS from your original account. I would advise waiting at least the minimum six months suggested at WP:Standard Offer, and you will need to make a convincing case that there will be no recurrence of any of your problematic behaviour (and a genuine apology for the death threats would be a good idea too). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Max Li Hao. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]