Jump to content

User talk:Mauriziok/Miss Earth 2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{Old AfD multi | date = 10 December 2015 | result = '''keep''' | page = Miss Earth 2001}} {{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|class=|importance=}}

withdraws

[edit]

where did it say that all of these countries withdraw? Wait for decent information people Manhpham (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Venue

[edit]

The venue in vietnamese is Nhà hát san hô (literally: Coral Opera House or Coral Theatre), but Thanh Nien News, a counterpart of building this venue names it Stage of Beauty according to REF 3! So it should be called Stage of Beauty, right?? 1.53.95.155 (talk) 02:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned references in Miss Earth 2012

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Miss Earth 2012's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "question-answer":

  • From Miss Earth: Thuy, Trinh Thanh (December 6, 2010). "Miss India snags crown". Viet Nam News. Retrieved January 23, 2012.
  • From Miss Earth 2010: Thuy, Trinh Thanh (6 December 2010). "Miss India snags crown". Viet Nam News. Retrieved 23 January 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 12:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Miss Universe

[edit]

I'm pretty sure that not every single obscure beauty pageant deserves it's own page. This should be merged with the other ones.

Also, if it's about the winner herself, the name should be mentioned more than once... Schuddeboomw (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear whether this article is about the competition or the winner of the competition. It defiantly needs to be reworded and expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schuddeboomw (talkcontribs) 15:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Miss Earth 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]