User talk:Matt.kissick

From Wikipedia - Neutral Point of View: "The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting verifiable perspectives on a topic as evidenced by reliable sources. The policy requires that where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly. None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being judged as "the truth", in order that the various significant published viewpoints are made accessible to the reader, not just the most popular one. It should also not be asserted that the most popular view, or some sort of intermediate view among the different views, is the correct one to the extent that other views are mentioned only pejoratively. Readers should be allowed to form their own opinions."

- All info related to Channel Zero Inc. on related Wiki page is fact, and not based on opinion, perspective, or viewpoint, and therefore should not be subject to accusations bias or degradation of neutrality.

Again, from Wikipedia - Neutral Point of View: "Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but do not assert the opinions themselves. By "fact" we mean "a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute." For example, that a survey produced a certain published result would be a fact. That there is a planet called Mars is a fact. That Plato was a philosopher is a fact. No one seriously disputes any of these things. So we can feel free to assert as many of them as we can."

- If you find the opinion that represents the bias, feel free to edit at your discretion.

Matt.kissick (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest: round 2[edit]

I will repeat what I wrote previously -- do not edit articles with which you have some professional association. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not remove the {{Notability}} tag from the Channel Zero Inc. article until you can demonstrate Channel Zero's notability on the article's talk page. I've laid out the issue at Talk:Channel Zero Inc.: we have specific guidelines that have to be addressed for this article survive. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a personal interest in Channel Zero, and will continue to edit the article from a neutral position as I have been doing. I will also refer to my previous point, in which I stated that all information contained in the article is fact and not opinion.Matt.kissick (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]